Except AI doesn't steal anything. It would be a better analogy if he used their recipes to make a cake that's a combination of all the other cakes. But then they couldn't pretend AI is evil.
The biggest delusion is the loudest people complaining are those who just dog someone else's style. Make no mistake, nobody is asking AI to do art in the style of anyone on Deviantart.
The AI baker would have to actually take the base recipe and painstakingly follow each step.
Bake the cake (lineart)
Do the filling (colors)
Finish it off with frosting (shading)
What the AI baker does is takes a piece of finished cakes, throws them into a blender, creates a hideous glop, and clueless normies get excited while being oblivious off what it takes to make a proper cake.
Yes but what I'm trying to say is that the original art is still intact. AI Air doesn't steal from artists any more than artists steal from each other. The only difference is that AI is very efficient at replicating what artists do, and they're salty about that. But the only artists that are gonna suffer from this are the ones that aren't very orignal themselves because if they were they wouldn't have a problem as AI can't do anything truly original.
AI is an awful idea and I have no clue why any of you are supporting it. Mark my words that it's just going to be used by the government to further suppress any opposition to globalism
it doesn't matter what we think, if it is possible it will be done
so its better for there to be open source and publicly deployable AI that can be used to potentially counter at least some of the harm that institutional AI will cause
AI can be useful in certain situations, it's a tool. The government is gonna make use of any tools to further its corrupt goals as long as it's corrupt. That said, artists crying because people like AI made art is funny.
AI itself isnt a bad idea just like cars aren't. but it's a force multiplier. using AI to make a unique painting to hang up in your home, or make videogame textures to save on resources, things like that? i dont see why not.
but youre right. its not gonna be that. it's going to be Here's Why White People Need To Die, a very convincing argument by ChatGPT3, and Infinite Customized Porn Just 3.99 a Month Now With Auto Masturbator
Except AI doesn't steal anything. It would be a better analogy if he used their recipes to make a cake that's a combination of all the other cakes. But then they couldn't pretend AI is evil.
The biggest delusion is the loudest people complaining are those who just dog someone else's style. Make no mistake, nobody is asking AI to do art in the style of anyone on Deviantart.
One problem with this.
The AI baker would have to actually take the base recipe and painstakingly follow each step.
What the AI baker does is takes a piece of finished cakes, throws them into a blender, creates a hideous glop, and clueless normies get excited while being oblivious off what it takes to make a proper cake.
Yes but what I'm trying to say is that the original art is still intact. AI Air doesn't steal from artists any more than artists steal from each other. The only difference is that AI is very efficient at replicating what artists do, and they're salty about that. But the only artists that are gonna suffer from this are the ones that aren't very orignal themselves because if they were they wouldn't have a problem as AI can't do anything truly original.
You mistakenly assume the AI wont evolve. Better to prevent then it is to cure.
The AI can evolve all it wants, an artist can still do original things that are meaningful anyway.
Yes it fucking does.
Show me the drawings that have gotten a piece sliced off by AI lmao
Edit: Wtf did he say that got auto-janned? Lmao
How did the AI get the idea to make art? By being fed other people's art. Did other people agreed to have their art fed into AI? No. Case closed.
So If I get the idea to make a painting inspired by someone else's work without their consent I'm a cunt now listen to yourself
AI is an awful idea and I have no clue why any of you are supporting it. Mark my words that it's just going to be used by the government to further suppress any opposition to globalism
it doesn't matter what we think, if it is possible it will be done
so its better for there to be open source and publicly deployable AI that can be used to potentially counter at least some of the harm that institutional AI will cause
Doesn't mean you have to support it
You can't seriously believe the public will ever have access to AI that's relevant
You can't put the daemon back into the box
Not the same thing as supporting it
AI can be useful in certain situations, it's a tool. The government is gonna make use of any tools to further its corrupt goals as long as it's corrupt. That said, artists crying because people like AI made art is funny.
AI itself isnt a bad idea just like cars aren't. but it's a force multiplier. using AI to make a unique painting to hang up in your home, or make videogame textures to save on resources, things like that? i dont see why not.
but youre right. its not gonna be that. it's going to be Here's Why White People Need To Die, a very convincing argument by ChatGPT3, and Infinite Customized Porn Just 3.99 a Month Now With Auto Masturbator