I don't, but he has interesting things to say about almost everything.
Although it's not a matter of science. Observed differences are a matter of science. The data is out there, and how you explain them is then a separate matter, as was shown in the 'intellectuals' of the title who in the beginning of the 20th century argued that differences proved that blacks were inferior and at the end of the 20th century argued that it proved discrimination.
The explanation for the differences is also a matter of science. That doesn't mean that everyone has to agree or that it has to be settled. But you can do experiments to determine the degree to which racial characteristics are genetics.
The explanation for the differences is also a matter of science
It might be at some point, but right now, there is no definitive scientific explanation.
But you can do experiments to determine the degree to which racial characteristics are genetics.
I think it's likely that intelligence and race has a large genetic component, but this does not necessitate dismissing anything that is not experimental as nonsense.
I don't, but he has interesting things to say about almost everything.
Although it's not a matter of science. Observed differences are a matter of science. The data is out there, and how you explain them is then a separate matter, as was shown in the 'intellectuals' of the title who in the beginning of the 20th century argued that differences proved that blacks were inferior and at the end of the 20th century argued that it proved discrimination.
The explanation for the differences is also a matter of science. That doesn't mean that everyone has to agree or that it has to be settled. But you can do experiments to determine the degree to which racial characteristics are genetics.
It might be at some point, but right now, there is no definitive scientific explanation.
I think it's likely that intelligence and race has a large genetic component, but this does not necessitate dismissing anything that is not experimental as nonsense.