The sooner people come to terms that Hitler was a good man and not evil the better. I don't think the boomers ever will, but that's because they took all the media indoctrination hook line and sinker. If I had the choice to have my country ran by Hitler or Justin Trudeau there is no competition.
It's not a very easy way to break this down to people, and there is certainly better ways to do it. But given the circumstances this kind of issue needs to be brought up one way or another. It's a serious issue, from which many other issues like immigration, wokeness, and debt poverty are derived. It has to enter public consciousness one way or another.
He wasn't a good man. But he wasn't the incarnation of evil either--no human can be that. Treating him as a man who did monstrous things (and some good things) is better than treating him as a monster because it removes our capacity to see ourselves--fellow man--in him.
The sooner people come to terms that Hitler was a good man and not evil the better. I don't think the boomers ever will, but that's because they took all the media indoctrination hook line and sinker. If I had the choice to have my country ran by Hitler or Justin Trudeau there is no competition.
Look uh... at the risk of sounding like a consooomer I'm going to make a Halo analogy. That's like asking if you'd rather be overrun by the Covenant or the Flood. The Covenant is obviously far more preferable, but yeah.
Hitler was selected as the scapegoat for an entire era, but he still bears much of the responsibility for the deaths of millions of conscripts, the eventual fall of Eastern Europe to the USSR, and the pariah status of race realism in the West, setting aside the internal strife he wreaked on Germany of course. Hitler running your country would eventually result in your death, your brother's death, and your sister getting raped by some communist.
You're welcome. If he didn't want fire-bombing, he should have made mass execution of civilians a policy in both war and peace. I don't even have to bring up the holocaust. Just the shit he pulled with Greece is enough.
I also approve of firebombing the Soviet Union because Stalin is evil as well.
At some point, you've got to have the guy who won't stop slaughtering everyone and everything stopped.
his policies justifed the firebombing of his country
For those not following along, this is the same asshole whose rebuttals to my criticism of Jewish power is "not all Jews." But I guess all Germans, right? Funny how NAXALT doesn't apply to liberalism's enemies. Whatever happened to all that individualism? You are genocidal, like I said. You have the audacity to call me a savage.
For the most part, I'm fucking with people who are saying "Hitler Dindu Nuffin"
Why should I give any sort of leeway to the criticisms of Nazi fans who would do not only the exact same, but far worse? If we play by the Hitler fan's rules, then mass genocide of every single liberal on earth is a moral imperative. I'm supposed to give moral tolerance and credence to someone who is dedicated to killing me, my family, my friends, and my country?
Nah. If you're supporting Nazi war crimes, crimes against humanity, and violent aggression; then I don't have to play nice.
If you support immolation and machine gunning of a church full of french civilians because you support collective abhorrent violence, then I don't have to stand here and treat you like an uninvolved third party. You appeal to my mercy when you are not in power because it is my principles; you deny me mercy when you are in power because it is in accordance with your principles.
Or, as Dave Smith once said, and I'm paraphrasing: "If we lived in Ancapistan in our bunker, and we saw an army of dudes, in uniform, with ladders and guns, obviously to break into our bunker... at some point you're going to have to treat that attacking army as a collective, because if you don't they will kill you." ... and you would.
Jokes, on you! I was only pretending to be genocidal!
This is just the old DrJester routine of "my opponents have even worse intentions than me therefore I can do whatever I want to them, including betraying all the principles I pretend to care about." It's vintage liberal bullshit.
mass genocide of every single liberal on earth is a moral imperative.
Nothing I say is consistent with this. Over and over and over again I tell you that liberalism is reproduced in a top down fashion. The mass of liberals are products of the system. It is you who is trying to direct me onto them throughout our recent conversations here. I wouldn't play along, and you just baselessly accuse me of being genocidal in a convo where you are justifying fire bombing civilians.
The sooner people come to terms that Hitler was a good man and not evil the better. I don't think the boomers ever will, but that's because they took all the media indoctrination hook line and sinker. If I had the choice to have my country ran by Hitler or Justin Trudeau there is no competition.
It's not a very easy way to break this down to people, and there is certainly better ways to do it. But given the circumstances this kind of issue needs to be brought up one way or another. It's a serious issue, from which many other issues like immigration, wokeness, and debt poverty are derived. It has to enter public consciousness one way or another.
He wasn't a good man. But he wasn't the incarnation of evil either--no human can be that. Treating him as a man who did monstrous things (and some good things) is better than treating him as a monster because it removes our capacity to see ourselves--fellow man--in him.
Look uh... at the risk of sounding like a consooomer I'm going to make a Halo analogy. That's like asking if you'd rather be overrun by the Covenant or the Flood. The Covenant is obviously far more preferable, but yeah.
Hitler was selected as the scapegoat for an entire era, but he still bears much of the responsibility for the deaths of millions of conscripts, the eventual fall of Eastern Europe to the USSR, and the pariah status of race realism in the West, setting aside the internal strife he wreaked on Germany of course. Hitler running your country would eventually result in your death, your brother's death, and your sister getting raped by some communist.
Hitler was an evil man, and his policies justifed the firebombing of his country.
Stop trying to simp for Socialists because you think you can be at the guard in the camp and not against the wall.
Proving your actually too stupid to be allowed around corners. Once again: "I totally wouldn't be the target of bad policy"
Now I know you are evil.
You're welcome. If he didn't want fire-bombing, he should have made mass execution of civilians a policy in both war and peace. I don't even have to bring up the holocaust. Just the shit he pulled with Greece is enough.
I also approve of firebombing the Soviet Union because Stalin is evil as well.
At some point, you've got to have the guy who won't stop slaughtering everyone and everything stopped.
By firebombing civilian populations and gunning down any survivors the next morning.
For those not following along, this is the same asshole whose rebuttals to my criticism of Jewish power is "not all Jews." But I guess all Germans, right? Funny how NAXALT doesn't apply to liberalism's enemies. Whatever happened to all that individualism? You are genocidal, like I said. You have the audacity to call me a savage.
For the most part, I'm fucking with people who are saying "Hitler Dindu Nuffin"
Why should I give any sort of leeway to the criticisms of Nazi fans who would do not only the exact same, but far worse? If we play by the Hitler fan's rules, then mass genocide of every single liberal on earth is a moral imperative. I'm supposed to give moral tolerance and credence to someone who is dedicated to killing me, my family, my friends, and my country?
Nah. If you're supporting Nazi war crimes, crimes against humanity, and violent aggression; then I don't have to play nice.
If you support immolation and machine gunning of a church full of french civilians because you support collective abhorrent violence, then I don't have to stand here and treat you like an uninvolved third party. You appeal to my mercy when you are not in power because it is my principles; you deny me mercy when you are in power because it is in accordance with your principles.
Or, as Dave Smith once said, and I'm paraphrasing: "If we lived in Ancapistan in our bunker, and we saw an army of dudes, in uniform, with ladders and guns, obviously to break into our bunker... at some point you're going to have to treat that attacking army as a collective, because if you don't they will kill you." ... and you would.
Jokes, on you! I was only pretending to be genocidal!
This is just the old DrJester routine of "my opponents have even worse intentions than me therefore I can do whatever I want to them, including betraying all the principles I pretend to care about." It's vintage liberal bullshit.
Nothing I say is consistent with this. Over and over and over again I tell you that liberalism is reproduced in a top down fashion. The mass of liberals are products of the system. It is you who is trying to direct me onto them throughout our recent conversations here. I wouldn't play along, and you just baselessly accuse me of being genocidal in a convo where you are justifying fire bombing civilians.
Priceless
Liberal Capitalism is the basis to the growth and prosperity of Western Civilization. You're completely backwards on that.
We are all ordinary men.