My favorite one are the idiots who argue the world is a simulation, because they ran the universe in a simulation, and asked the simulation to determine if the simulated universe was a simulation, and it discovered that it was.
From the headline you provided? I don't need to read the article. It's obvious bullshit. Either you got it very wrong, or it's actually a computer 'simulation' of a wormhole, which is uninteresting bullshit.
"Someone put some theoretical math into a 'simulation' and the theoretical math produced the expected result" ISN'T NEWS.
Gell-Mann amnesia effect in full force.
Also it's a useless article, dosen't even have a link to a paper or a preprint.
Journalists impressed by buzzwords
INTO THE TRASH IT GOES
This, it was not a physics experiment but a simulation based on rules.
My favorite one are the idiots who argue the world is a simulation, because they ran the universe in a simulation, and asked the simulation to determine if the simulated universe was a simulation, and it discovered that it was.
No shit.
That's actually a bit interesting. I thought quantum computers were still theoretical.
Article links to a NYT article that has a link to the paper on Nature. Locked behind a paywall though, which is sometimes to be expected.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05424-3
From the headline you provided? I don't need to read the article. It's obvious bullshit. Either you got it very wrong, or it's actually a computer 'simulation' of a wormhole, which is uninteresting bullshit.
"Someone put some theoretical math into a 'simulation' and the theoretical math produced the expected result" ISN'T NEWS.