British Psychological Society actually hits the target, but I think the wording is a little non-committal.
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (43)
sorted by:
https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/blackrock-adds-diversity-target-us-boardrooms-2021-12-14/
Here is BlackRock demanding that boards diversify themselves. Considering their asset share, that's going to have more impact than anyone else doing this. Note that I assumed that they would push this under ESGs, but they might push the diversity outside of it. I don't really know.
Ironically, their definition of diverse doesn't include women, something I think is long overdue.
Less female boards is a good thing. If companies stop hiring women to fit "diversity" because BlackRock changed the logic, I fail to see the issue.
Competing with 6.5% is a lot easier than competing with 50% who all hate you.
It's not ideal, but it's better than the legal definition of diversity, which calls the 51% female Disney board diverse.