This is the second hit piece against that show I've seen this week. Someone powerful feels threatened by something in it. Either that or Hancock pissed in someone's Cheerios.
He's outside the academic snake-pit because he's found an audience and doesn't need them.
As i have said here before in another context, the little fiefdoms in university History and Anthropology departments always react this way to anyone who threatens their stranglehold on the "truth."
Tweedy drudges who have spent their entire careers bolstering the academic orthodoxy on human origins and the civilization timeline react with hostility to challenges. The more credible and unorthodox the challenge, the more vehement the attacks on the heretic.
Non-academics in media jump on the orthodox band wagon because they naturally gravitate toward the bogus "authority" of academics.
The series show megaliths and ancient star-worshipping civilizations in Asia, Europe, the Americas, Oceania area, and basically everywhere except Africa.
This is what they want to suppress, the idea that Africa wasn't the genesis of the modern world, but rather only the people that long left it or perhaps never were there at all were the ones who created civilization.
The ancients he posits traveled the seas and went everywhere teaching people civilization, yet either avoided or failed at civilizing Africa.
My family went to Africa in the 1680’s and stayed there longer than America has been a country. I left in 2017 when the muti killings spiked (its where they kidnap people in order to chop off body parts for use in a sort of voodoo/black magic). The most powerful muti supposedly comes from children BTW.
Take it from me, there’s no civilising that place.
This is the second hit piece against that show I've seen this week. Someone powerful feels threatened by something in it. Either that or Hancock pissed in someone's Cheerios.
He's outside the academic snake-pit because he's found an audience and doesn't need them.
As i have said here before in another context, the little fiefdoms in university History and Anthropology departments always react this way to anyone who threatens their stranglehold on the "truth."
Tweedy drudges who have spent their entire careers bolstering the academic orthodoxy on human origins and the civilization timeline react with hostility to challenges. The more credible and unorthodox the challenge, the more vehement the attacks on the heretic.
Non-academics in media jump on the orthodox band wagon because they naturally gravitate toward the bogus "authority" of academics.
The series show megaliths and ancient star-worshipping civilizations in Asia, Europe, the Americas, Oceania area, and basically everywhere except Africa.
This is what they want to suppress, the idea that Africa wasn't the genesis of the modern world, but rather only the people that long left it or perhaps never were there at all were the ones who created civilization.
The ancients he posits traveled the seas and went everywhere teaching people civilization, yet either avoided or failed at civilizing Africa.
My family went to Africa in the 1680’s and stayed there longer than America has been a country. I left in 2017 when the muti killings spiked (its where they kidnap people in order to chop off body parts for use in a sort of voodoo/black magic). The most powerful muti supposedly comes from children BTW.
Take it from me, there’s no civilising that place.