Trump attacks some of the GOP establishment clowns everyday but he expects the RNC establishment clown organization to fund his candidates?
Not many people expected Mitch McConnel to go full "Kill the Republican Party to save the Bureaucracy". McConnel has previously worked with Trump, but this is a clear effort where he's working actively against Trump at this point, to the benefit of the Democratic Party over everything else. This is just the latest degeneration of that relationship.
JD Vance underperformed heavily against Tim Ryan because Vance had a terrible ground game. I love Vance's rhetoric and policies but his campaigning was subpar. DeWine is an establishment rat but he carried Vance across the finish line with his large margin win coattails.
Underperformed? Are you high? He got 56% of the vote. That's what Sharrod Brown (D) won with back in 2018 in his Senate race. DeWine got the votes he did because of the overall trend to Republicans. While DeWine got 200,000 more votes from 2018, the Dem candidate lost nearly 500,000. Now, I'll grant you, DeWine needs to be replaced because he pushed the lockdowns in Ohio, but was so worthless that literally everyone ignored him and went about their merry way in defiance of his executive orders, all while the cops refused to enforce it. But that's not a surprise from a whiny, weak, slimy, bitch: he's easy to counter.
The biggest problem with JD Vance is that almost nobody had heard of him. I didn't even know who he was until I realized he wrote Hillbilly Eulogy. But to describe Mike DeWine as carrying him over the finish line? That's just nonsense. The man is a charisma vacuum. I didn't even know DeWine was running, nor did I know that he had a Democratic opponent (because that hasn't always been the case) until voting day. The Dems put 100% of their ground game into winning Portman's seat from Vance.
Vance couldn't even match that margin in 2022 with a overall R+2 electorate.
I have no idea what you're trying to go for here since Republicans swept up almost everything, and so did Republican issues. Again, a 53% win over the Dems is a very safe win. Just because Trump won Ohio by 8, it doesn't mean that you would call it an under-performance if a Republican won by 7.
Vance's ground game wasn't good enough, but it was a safe win anyways. I'm not seeing why you would believe that Frank LaRose would preform any better because I saw zero ground game from him. At least I saw Vance's attack ads on Tim Ryan.
Why did you separate every sentence with a line break? And calm down, it was a passing joke about Donald Trump Jr. Don't actually get triggered.
And I'd like to see the difference between JR Majewski and JD Vance to absolutely blew the fuck out of Tim Ryan, and is a staunch populist.
As far as Trump's funding, it may not be great, but that's what you're supposed to have an RNC for in the first place.
I am using my phone to type, it fucks with the formatting
Trump attacks some of the GOP establishment clowns everyday but he expects the RNC establishment clown organization to fund his candidates?
How does that make any sense?
Trump should have been funding his own handpicked candidates.
The fact that he didn't bother to fund them shows he is either not competent or not serious about fixing the country. Either of which is disturbing.
JD Vance underperformed heavily against Tim Ryan because Vance had a terrible ground game.
I love Vance's rhetoric and policies but his campaigning was subpar.
DeWine is an establishment rat but he carried Vance across the finish line with his large margin win coattails.
Not many people expected Mitch McConnel to go full "Kill the Republican Party to save the Bureaucracy". McConnel has previously worked with Trump, but this is a clear effort where he's working actively against Trump at this point, to the benefit of the Democratic Party over everything else. This is just the latest degeneration of that relationship.
Underperformed? Are you high? He got 56% of the vote. That's what Sharrod Brown (D) won with back in 2018 in his Senate race. DeWine got the votes he did because of the overall trend to Republicans. While DeWine got 200,000 more votes from 2018, the Dem candidate lost nearly 500,000. Now, I'll grant you, DeWine needs to be replaced because he pushed the lockdowns in Ohio, but was so worthless that literally everyone ignored him and went about their merry way in defiance of his executive orders, all while the cops refused to enforce it. But that's not a surprise from a whiny, weak, slimy, bitch: he's easy to counter.
The biggest problem with JD Vance is that almost nobody had heard of him. I didn't even know who he was until I realized he wrote Hillbilly Eulogy. But to describe Mike DeWine as carrying him over the finish line? That's just nonsense. The man is a charisma vacuum. I didn't even know DeWine was running, nor did I know that he had a Democratic opponent (because that hasn't always been the case) until voting day. The Dems put 100% of their ground game into winning Portman's seat from Vance.
2020 was an overall D+3 electorate year and Trump won Ohio by 8.
Vance couldn't even match that margin in 2022 with a overall R+2 electorate.
I like Vance and I am very glad he won but he still definitely underperformed.
Ohio is not a swing state anymore, if Vance had a good ground game he would have won by 10 points this year against clown Tim Ryan.
Ohio is a red state now.
Sherrod Brown has been extremely lucky to only run in D favoring electorate years(2006, 2012, 2018).
In 2024 as long as the Ohio GOP doesn't nominate a loser like Josh Mandel or JR Majewski, Sherrod Brown will finally be going down.
Frank LaRose for senate in 2024 would likely send Sherrod Brown into the dirt.
I have no idea what you're trying to go for here since Republicans swept up almost everything, and so did Republican issues. Again, a 53% win over the Dems is a very safe win. Just because Trump won Ohio by 8, it doesn't mean that you would call it an under-performance if a Republican won by 7.
Vance's ground game wasn't good enough, but it was a safe win anyways. I'm not seeing why you would believe that Frank LaRose would preform any better because I saw zero ground game from him. At least I saw Vance's attack ads on Tim Ryan.