Yeah, this was fucking awful even by MSM standards. It would be terrible enough if Matt actually said those words in a completely different and reasonable context, but he literally never even said them- it was a reply from someone completly opposed to Walsh.
The 1st editor to lay eyes on this should have, as a matter of common sense, said "He didn't really say that, did he? I must ensure there's solid proof before allowing that to be published..." And if not then why didn't that editor's boss?
It seems contrived. At least the "slander someone for publicity" part. They may or may not have anticipated having to take it down. They have to screech to be heard.
Some of the deranged exchanges on Twatter suggest that we're approaching a full on war between the trannies, their leftist allies, and everyone else. They've painted themselves into a corner with their batshit crazy rhetoric and their dupes are getting salty.
he isn't anywhere near that based
Reminds me of a co-worker complaining that our local left-wing parrot-cage-liner had become a right-wing rag in the last few years.
I believe if she heard me express some of my actual political views, she'd have a fatal cardio-neurological event.
She’s had the vaxx you mean?
Also fat, old, and a smoker, but mostly libshit_cant_process_reality.
The woman who wrote the fake article is ironically named "Sue"
https://twitter.com/MattWalshBlog/status/1595072941187891201
Why can’t he sue for 2.75 trillion in damages? We don’t have free speech for journalists any more…
I'm surprised every time I'm reminded that piece of shit website still exists.
Fire her, fire the editor who approved it, fire every person with the slightest objection to either of those two being fired.
Yeah, this was fucking awful even by MSM standards. It would be terrible enough if Matt actually said those words in a completely different and reasonable context, but he literally never even said them- it was a reply from someone completly opposed to Walsh.
The 1st editor to lay eyes on this should have, as a matter of common sense, said "He didn't really say that, did he? I must ensure there's solid proof before allowing that to be published..." And if not then why didn't that editor's boss?
It seems contrived. At least the "slander someone for publicity" part. They may or may not have anticipated having to take it down. They have to screech to be heard.
I used to be a Democrat, and would frequent Daily Kos. I seen the Wokeshevik takeover of the left in real time on that site among others.
Some of the deranged exchanges on Twatter suggest that we're approaching a full on war between the trannies, their leftist allies, and everyone else. They've painted themselves into a corner with their batshit crazy rhetoric and their dupes are getting salty.