We all know the story of the ADL's recent actions vindicating critics of Jewish power. We here are also familiar with anti-idpol, the idea that identity politics such as BLM, feminism and white nationalism, etc. are bad and should be discarded in favor of egalatarianism and the movmement/scene/faction/whatever that attempts to make that happen. Anti-idpol's response to the ADL's recent actions has been to declare that the ADL's apparent pro-Jewish activism is merely a front for their real goal, supporting Democrats, a response that I mocked and critiqued more rigorously. Anti-idpol's followup so far has been to sub "Fabian" in place of "Democrat" and restate the argument. This does almost nothing to alleviate the problems with this take that I pointed out in my critique. I suspect anti-idpol will sub nearly any word in the dictionary - with notable ommissions under "J" - in place of "Democrats" to see what they can get to stick if you play their games long enough.
Now imagine if black or white nationalism was in the news doing something bad. Do you think anti-idpol would hesitate to critique either one as a political force? They certainly don't hesitate to condemn white nationalism with the strongest possible language, calling it genocidal. You would think Jewish idpol doing something bad would be a great opportunity for them to point out problems with additional forms of idpol. Instead, they seek to launder Jewish idpol's actions by blaming them on other political forces. How can anyone take so-called anti-idpol seriously when it washes the hands of Jewish idpol like this? It looks fake and gay to me. Will they finally cede ground and admit that we are witnessing Jewish idpol in action?
There is no deflection. You omitted it because it shows that they reached out to the UN in order to protect diaspora Jews. In other words, the motivation was Jewish interest. You are the one deflecting. You know what you did.
DARVO
WTF are you talking about?
You are doing that "no true Jewman" bullshit where you deny the Jewishness of ancestral, ethnic secular Jews. I don't see where the ADL required the boycotted Israeli settlers to renounce Judaism in exchange for its support. Why did they fight a circumcision ban and explicitly stand up for religious Jews? Also, what's this?
There is a historical and still existing political force that re-established and maintains Israel as a state for those of Jewish ancestry, Judaism-practicing or not. The rest of the planet calls this political force "Zionism." Your attempt to redefine the word has all the intellectual honesty and attachment to reality as the "IT'S MA'AM!" guy, but I'll humor you anyway. You can share with me your word to describe this political force if you want. For now, I'll call it "Project Banana." What do you think of Trump and the Republicans supporting Project Banana and leftists also supporting Project Banana?
Women got women the right to vote. Liberalism was the ideological abstraction they used to morally justify it, convince liberal men to go along with it, and fit it within the established system's laws and norms. People do things. Ideologies are tools. You seem to think the tools themselves have agency.
This question still stands.