We all know the story of the ADL's recent actions vindicating critics of Jewish power. We here are also familiar with anti-idpol, the idea that identity politics such as BLM, feminism and white nationalism, etc. are bad and should be discarded in favor of egalatarianism and the movmement/scene/faction/whatever that attempts to make that happen. Anti-idpol's response to the ADL's recent actions has been to declare that the ADL's apparent pro-Jewish activism is merely a front for their real goal, supporting Democrats, a response that I mocked and critiqued more rigorously. Anti-idpol's followup so far has been to sub "Fabian" in place of "Democrat" and restate the argument. This does almost nothing to alleviate the problems with this take that I pointed out in my critique. I suspect anti-idpol will sub nearly any word in the dictionary - with notable ommissions under "J" - in place of "Democrats" to see what they can get to stick if you play their games long enough.
Now imagine if black or white nationalism was in the news doing something bad. Do you think anti-idpol would hesitate to critique either one as a political force? They certainly don't hesitate to condemn white nationalism with the strongest possible language, calling it genocidal. You would think Jewish idpol doing something bad would be a great opportunity for them to point out problems with additional forms of idpol. Instead, they seek to launder Jewish idpol's actions by blaming them on other political forces. How can anyone take so-called anti-idpol seriously when it washes the hands of Jewish idpol like this? It looks fake and gay to me. Will they finally cede ground and admit that we are witnessing Jewish idpol in action?
Since you're going to literally quote me.
My stance is pointing out that your Identity Politics is just a vaneer for socialism and you and the ADL both know it and are playing the same game.
Yes, and I have. That's why I keep calling BLM a Black National Socialist movement. That's what it is. WEB Du Bouis basically invented the term Black Folk as a reference to creating a black Volkish movement.
Most Identity Politics we see today is a skin-suit of Socialists. It has been since the Progressive Nationalist movement. Just because you don't like being called out, doesn't mean it's not what you're doing. Zionists use jews as a skin suit. National Socialists use Germans as a skin suit. Feminism uses women as a skin suit. Unions use Labor as a skin suit. You use white people as a skin suit.
Just so I understand you, is your claim is that the ADL (among other Jewish idpol organizations, but we can mostly focus on them for now) is not operating for the benefit of Jews?
Nope. And we can focus on all of the different groups because they are all doing the same thing.
BLM doesn't operate for the benefit of blacks, particularly when they are defunding the police and getting black criminals out of jail to terrorize black communities, while supporting black abortions and poverty through dependency structures. Socialism is antithetical to any human interest. There are no Chinese Communists, there are only Communists that happen to be Chinese.
Same thing here: Leftist jews aren't jews. They're Leftists. I'd go so far as to say that secular jews in general aren't even jews. The religion is the core of the ethnic group. Abandoning judaism is abandoning jewishness. Leftism requires the abandonment of judaism, and also requires the abandonment of property, family, and community. Leftism requires the annihilation of judaism, as Marx explicitly stated.
Did you even read my comment that I linked in the OP?
https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/16ZDhBALTQ/x/c/4TnP1iO8Ogi
The only thing you sort of addressed about it by swapping "Democrats" out for "Fabians" is that you acknowledge the ADL as a global organization, unlike the original claim floated about their agenda being about Democrats and therefore US domestic politics. Everything else stands unaddressed.
I was answering the one question you asked. Why would I answer a question from 4 days ago in a reply to a question from exactly this second?