Hypergamy
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (32)
sorted by:
Hypergamy
0% chance this is true. I've never met a man who truly hates women if he is sexually successful. Chads may have disdain for women or look down on them, but they never have the seething hatred and rage for women that Imp does. Only incels have that kind of rage.
I'm not gigachad enough to have this happen, but I've known guys who are. Absolutely none of them minded it, and all were on the balance very happy to get the constant ego boosting. Women are generally polite and not pushy, and are very easy to wave away if the guy isn't in the mood. One guy I knew in college, when we hung out and went back to his dorm room, he had like 50+ voicemails, and like 90% of them were from chicks trying to make up excuses to have contact with him. He just put it on speaker and let it rip, and was like "welcome to my life bruh" but it was totally a humblebrag.
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. You've fallen into the common incel trap of thinking that 100% of women are instathots. Is what you say true of some ass-poster on IG who have tens or hundreds of thousands of simp followers? Absolutely. Is it true of the rest of the 99.9% of women? Absolutely not.
Studies have shown that women have more sexual power peaking at age 18, then slowly declining until it reverses at age 27, and then men slowly gain and it never stops. For people in their 40s, men have far more sexual power.
There are roughly equal numbers of men and women, so if you can't get a woman, you're an idiot. One common pattern I've noticed among incel guys is that they're all trying to date trophy women out of their league, failing because they lack the value to compete and constantly lose to higher value men, and then get ultra-butthurt over it and cope by hating women instead of accepting their lower value.
Plenty of men manage to "date up". I'm one of them. I'm like a 7.5/10. My girlfriend is a 9.5/10 objectively and a 10/10 once you consider how she looks for her age. I didn't need to be rich, or tall, or have a giant dick, or anything like that. All I needed to do was carry a conversation with her and be able to be entertaining and interesting to her on our dates, and she got attached. Did I get lucky? Yes. But I dated ~200 women before her, maybe about 10 of them batshit crazy. I have lots of shitty dates. But it only took finding one good one and I've been with her over 10 years now.
Until I met her, I felt like I'd never find "the one" and would burn out on dating at times, but it's a numbers game and you just have to keep grinding until you find the one, or you give up and settle for a "good enough".
Considering the only alternative is a Taliban-assigned wife, it's dumb to bother complaining about it. It's just going to be the reality unless you take away the freedom to choose and consent from women.
A big percentage of women on those shitty online dating sites are only on there to farm followers for their social media pages, they aren't really single, but they will still reply to Chads and might fuck them.
But online dating is really not representative of the real world. It's a sausagefest and since the male to female ratio skews so heavily male, women react by becoming intensely superficial.
MEN DO THE SAME THING. This is how blondes became a thing. Blonde hair and blue eyes are rare genetic mutations. But a long time ago, some disaster bottlenecked men (most men died) so the ratio skewed strongly in men's favor, with a few men and a lot of women. So what did the men do? They massively preferred blonde hair and light eyes, and so the population shifted strongly in favor of both those things. Without the bottleneck, blondes and light eyes would have remained at relatively low percentages of the population.
So your view of online dating comes entirely from the skewed ratio.
Your link is primarily an advertisement site which has an incentive to lie and exaggerate the number of women in order to promote the sites. As someone who actually did online dating, this chick claiming - without sources - that these apps have over 50% women is just blatantly lying and ass pulling.
Tinder has a gender imbalance, with 75% of users identifying as male.
72% users are male and only 28% female
85% of the UK’s dating app user base is male. On Tinder this figure is even higher, with roughly one female user for every nine male users.
Also a LOT of "female" accounts are actually just bots, scammers, and advertisement profiles, not genuine people looking to date. So once you eliminated those, the skew would be considerably worse.
My main problem with the claim that Imp is an Adonis giga-chad is that there’s zero proof to support his extraordinary claim. If he had instead claimed that he was a regular guy, I’d have no problem taking it at face value.
Plus he has every incentive to lie and claim to be a Gigachad when he isn't one, to deflect the very obvious criticism that "you're just an ugly loser who hates women because they don't want you". Imp wants to be taken seriously and not dismissed, ergo he has every reason to lie.
We know different kinds of women then
I’m thinking they were being sarcastic.
I took this entire post, and the initial comments, as being intended as humorous…
It doesn’t make any sense, otherwise.
Like, I had the same initial thoughts as you, and then I realized it was probably meant in jest…
It’s too fucking weird to be anything else, lol.
oh there are real people like this, at least online. dude is very serious.
Well that worries me, then.
If anyone actually believes Imp is as described... Really? Like, really?
As you just outlined, no "gigachad" (self hating or otherwise) is that bitter about the women who "fall at his feet"...
Surely the more logical explanation is that Imp is just a sad, bitter misogynist? I fail to see how anyone could deny that, at this point...