A June 24 Metro article relates the fears of homosexuals who feel they are being unfairly linked to the pedophilia scandal in the Catholic Church.
In fact, the real scandal is that the press has failed to adequately investigate the link between homosexuality and child sexual abuse. The Family Research Council has just released a comprehensive report on the subject, which connects the dots. The report, titled "Homosexuality and Child Sexual Abuse," brings to light some significant findings:
Pedophiles are invariably males: A report by the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children states: "In both clinical and non-clinical samples, the vast majority of offenders are male." The book "Sexual Offending Against Children" reports that only 12 of 3,000 incarcerated pedophiles in England were women.
Significant numbers of victims are males: A study of 457 male sex offenders against children in Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy found that "approximately one-third of these sexual offenders directed their sexual activity against males."
Homosexuals make up less than 3 percent of the population, not "8 to 10 percent" as your article reported. A recent study in Demography estimates the number of exclusive male homosexuals in the general population at 2.5 percent and the number of exclusive lesbians at 1.4 percent.
Homosexuals are overrepresented in child sex offenses: Individuals from the 1 percent to 3 percent of the population that is sexually attracted to the same sex are committing up to one-third of the sex crimes against children. A study in the Journal of Sex Research found that although heterosexuals outnumber homosexuals by a ratio of at least 20 to 1, homosexual pedophiles commit about one-third of the total number of child sex offenses.
The evidence shows a direct correlation between homosexuality and pedophilia. Your story should have included such evidence, because it affects not just the Catholic Church but all those concerned with shielding children from sexual abuse.
-- Timothy J. Dailey
Bust those facts out the next time a groomer gets uppity
No, that'd be ridiculous. Only 50x higher? It's likely a significant female majority, considering the lengths they've gone to. Why would they be so interested in manipulating the definition if it didn't greatly harm their image?
Just look at how many women are ripping men off for child support and remember that forced impregnation is considered rape when done to a woman.
If the rules were applied evenly, the female graph would go off the chart and the male one would be barely visible. That's the truth of our society's bias. There's likely 10,000+% underreporting because lying about birth control isn't considered rape, for a start.
This is why you're a liability to your cause.
If you'd just stuck to the actual facts (made-to-penetrate statistics show that female sexual assault far closer to 50/50 than people would expect) then you're good.
But you take that extra step, insert the global matriarchy conspiracy theory, and jump off into crazy land.
Imp doesn't suggest a global matriarchy. He maintains that the world is intensely gynocentric.
If you are going to take issue with his points, then at least represent his position correctly.
FYI it is fairly trivial to prove that the world is gynocentric. After that we are just arguing about degree.
Or do you think it was just coincidence that all the women were evacuated from the Titanic? That only men were asked to die in WWI and WWII? Who were they fighting for, do you think?
When I first got to this site, I thought he was some 5000iq pro-semite who was trying to show how stupid the “it’s every.single.one of them.” types are - but as I saw more of his posts I began to understand that: no, he’s just a fucking moron
Ok so you’re going to pretend to be a complete and total retard. Get fucked then, faggot.
He isn't pretending.
"Stealthing", the act of removing a condom after agreeing to use one, is considered rape.
Imagine how many women would be locked up if "I'm on the pill" lies were punished. Unemployment would reach zero, because there'd be so much need for more female jails.
No shit RETARD. If you agreed to a massage and ended up pregnant you’d feel violated too.
When SHTF, I hope you get sent to a women’s gulag
Stop quoting and replying to yourself in comment chains that ping me lmfao
So why isn't a woman lying about birth control to get her 18 year payoff considered rape?
I wasn't replying to myself, I was reiterating my original point because it clearly went over your head.
Would you agree that nobody would voluntarily have a child if they didn't want one? So why isn't every "deadbeat father"'s partner charged with rape and locked up? Make an example of a few and I guarantee they wouldn't pull that trick for much longer.
It seems blindingly obvious to me that nobody chooses to have a child then abandons it. The logical answer is that they were tricked into it, which, when it happens to a woman, is considered rape.