A June 24 Metro article relates the fears of homosexuals who feel they are being unfairly linked to the pedophilia scandal in the Catholic Church.
In fact, the real scandal is that the press has failed to adequately investigate the link between homosexuality and child sexual abuse. The Family Research Council has just released a comprehensive report on the subject, which connects the dots. The report, titled "Homosexuality and Child Sexual Abuse," brings to light some significant findings:
Pedophiles are invariably males: A report by the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children states: "In both clinical and non-clinical samples, the vast majority of offenders are male." The book "Sexual Offending Against Children" reports that only 12 of 3,000 incarcerated pedophiles in England were women.
Significant numbers of victims are males: A study of 457 male sex offenders against children in Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy found that "approximately one-third of these sexual offenders directed their sexual activity against males."
Homosexuals make up less than 3 percent of the population, not "8 to 10 percent" as your article reported. A recent study in Demography estimates the number of exclusive male homosexuals in the general population at 2.5 percent and the number of exclusive lesbians at 1.4 percent.
Homosexuals are overrepresented in child sex offenses: Individuals from the 1 percent to 3 percent of the population that is sexually attracted to the same sex are committing up to one-third of the sex crimes against children. A study in the Journal of Sex Research found that although heterosexuals outnumber homosexuals by a ratio of at least 20 to 1, homosexual pedophiles commit about one-third of the total number of child sex offenses.
The evidence shows a direct correlation between homosexuality and pedophilia. Your story should have included such evidence, because it affects not just the Catholic Church but all those concerned with shielding children from sexual abuse.
-- Timothy J. Dailey
Bust those facts out the next time a groomer gets uppity
No shit RETARD. If you agreed to a massage and ended up pregnant you’d feel violated too.
When SHTF, I hope you get sent to a women’s gulag
Stop quoting and replying to yourself in comment chains that ping me lmfao
So why isn't a woman lying about birth control to get her 18 year payoff considered rape?
I wasn't replying to myself, I was reiterating my original point because it clearly went over your head.
Would you agree that nobody would voluntarily have a child if they didn't want one? So why isn't every "deadbeat father"'s partner charged with rape and locked up? Make an example of a few and I guarantee they wouldn't pull that trick for much longer.
It seems blindingly obvious to me that nobody chooses to have a child then abandons it. The logical answer is that they were tricked into it, which, when it happens to a woman, is considered rape.
You have a good point here, and I'd like to see a new topic created on it. Although remember to tone down the "all women = trash" and highlight the actual bias in law and effect.
Sir this is a Wendy’s
I don’t care about your pet issue
You started this debate, you child.