No, that's absurd. The problem with Rishi is not that he is an Indian, the problem with Rishi and all previous PMs is that they're representing the elites and not the people.
Would you prefer a rape gang-protecting, transgenderism-supprorting full British person to an Indian who is based (and I'm not saying Rishi is)?
It's possible for two people to be bad. It's even possible for every PM from Churchill onward to be bad. There's a part of me that thinks Corbyn would have been better, although still generally bad. Being an avowed leftist radical would have prevented him from being as leftist as the Tories have been due to political constraints. At a minimum, his foreign policy would have been better.
Political leaders are generally bad. You don't get to the top through moral excellence, or any sort of excellence except manipulation.
Hereditary monarchy is quite bad, and I don't support reintroducing it, but at least it is a way to ensure that only some of the people who come to power are bad, rather than close to 100%.
He's not British.
Yes, and the people who covered up the mass rapes in Rotherham were.
Being British, or not, does not make for a good leader or a bad leader.
I think Rishi is a terrible leader, but not because he is an Indian.
It's a pretty good indication Britain is an occupied country.
No, that's absurd. The problem with Rishi is not that he is an Indian, the problem with Rishi and all previous PMs is that they're representing the elites and not the people.
Would you prefer a rape gang-protecting, transgenderism-supprorting full British person to an Indian who is based (and I'm not saying Rishi is)?
If having a foreigner as the head of government isn't an indicator of occupation, I don't know what possibly could be.
It's possible for two people to be bad. It's even possible for every PM from Churchill onward to be bad. There's a part of me that thinks Corbyn would have been better, although still generally bad. Being an avowed leftist radical would have prevented him from being as leftist as the Tories have been due to political constraints. At a minimum, his foreign policy would have been better.
Political leaders are generally bad. You don't get to the top through moral excellence, or any sort of excellence except manipulation.
Hereditary monarchy is quite bad, and I don't support reintroducing it, but at least it is a way to ensure that only some of the people who come to power are bad, rather than close to 100%.