No, that's absurd. The problem with Rishi is not that he is an Indian, the problem with Rishi and all previous PMs is that they're representing the elites and not the people.
Would you prefer a rape gang-protecting, transgenderism-supprorting full British person to an Indian who is based (and I'm not saying Rishi is)?
Was Russia under Catherine the Great an 'occupied state'? Was Poland under Henry III of France, a monarch elected by the Poles? Was France under Napoleon, or Germany under Hitler, or Russia under Stalin? Or Rome under Trajan, who was born in Hispania.
It's a pretty good indication Britain is an occupied country.
No, that's absurd. The problem with Rishi is not that he is an Indian, the problem with Rishi and all previous PMs is that they're representing the elites and not the people.
Would you prefer a rape gang-protecting, transgenderism-supprorting full British person to an Indian who is based (and I'm not saying Rishi is)?
If having a foreigner as the head of government isn't an indicator of occupation, I don't know what possibly could be.
I’m starting to think Antonio might have brain damage.
Was Russia under Catherine the Great an 'occupied state'? Was Poland under Henry III of France, a monarch elected by the Poles? Was France under Napoleon, or Germany under Hitler, or Russia under Stalin? Or Rome under Trajan, who was born in Hispania.
Those examples aren't proving what you think they are.