The media's hatred of whites is so blatant you have to be complicit to not see it
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (89)
sorted by:
But both defendants are male... Sex clearly isn't the basis for discrimination by the author...
Imp thinks women invented racial grievance politics in the late 1980s as part of a plot to genocide the male population.
I know, he's omnipresent here, as are all the comments about him. I don't think he's wrong to believe there's clear and obvious favouritism toward women in many circumstances, but I wish he would take a cooler and more measured approach. Cheers.
He used to be more sane. He's gone round the bend worse as time has passed.
A cursory look shows he has been banned multiple times, made his own dot.win, and even used an alt account to ban evade.
So he made an echo chamber for his ramblings which is why he gets worse as there is no pushback as shown in this thread, and even after that still could not keep it to himself for however long the ban was he decided to evade.
With the number of posts he makes daily it would not surprise me if this is all he actually does despite claiming otherwise.
There are racial politics in the Bible so he's a bit late on the date. It's almost as if racial tribalism is an ancient, eternal struggle while contemporary gender politics are a product of the times.
MtF surgery was invented by your fellow Jewish man Magnus Hirschfeld. The modern push for it is bankrolled mostly by wealthy Jewish men.
These people are mostly employees. Their power is quite limited compared to that of the tranny movement's benefactors described above. The tranny push is top down, not bottom up.
But is it a good thing?
OK, and then what? What's that got to do with him?
Assuming this arguendo, is the fact that they are bankrolling it in any way related to the fact that they are Jewish, or is that just incidental? If you found out that a disproportionate number of them were left-handed, would you also get mad about that?
A black woman.
(But I do agree with you.)
You're wasting your time. If they had indisputable evidence that everything I said was right, they'd bury everything women did, just to pump up birth rates.
You'd never find out, because they don't care about white men. Racial nationalism is inherently pro-woman because it puts more value on their wombs. Your value is to die for the regime or be the punching bag for your white woman superiors.
They will gladly lick the high heel, as long as it's a white woman's.
You yourself put value on their wombs yesterday when you admitted that you want an infinite growth of consumers. This is you arguing in favor of immigration.