You yourself put value on their wombs yesterday when you admitted that you want an infinite growth of consumers. This is you arguing in favor of immigration.
Don't be cagey now. Does Mr. M$ investor himself want major economic changes or not? You later said this:
No, because it's [not being consumerist] not possible. People would lose their entire worth in the markets if the world shifted to this.
Putting this all together, it seems as if you believe that it's an immutable economic reality that there must constantly be more consumers, which means wombs will always have value.
But according to you, men who have children automatically suffer so the more births there are, the more suffering there will be.
Correct
That means your worldview is incapable of fixing anything unless you are willing to endure potential economic reforms or hardship. Are you willing to do that or not?
You yourself put value on their wombs yesterday when you admitted that you want an infinite growth of consumers. This is you arguing in favor of immigration.
Don't be cagey now. Does Mr. M$ investor himself want major economic changes or not? You later said this:
Putting this all together, it seems as if you believe that it's an immutable economic reality that there must constantly be more consumers, which means wombs will always have value.
But according to you, men who have children automatically suffer so the more births there are, the more suffering there will be.
That means your worldview is incapable of fixing anything unless you are willing to endure potential economic reforms or hardship. Are you willing to do that or not?