Bad statement, women tend to be far more nepotistic but as for it being genetic or inherent is disputable. I would rather argue women are far more susceptible to operant and social conditioning compared to men as our testosterone makes us inherently disagreeable and competitive versus women whose hormones value a conformist ideologue to appease their emotional state.
Bro I detest Imp's psychosis as much as the next poster but he's correct in this instance.
It makes sense from an evolutionary psychology perspective. Women are the bottle neck on the propagation of the species so everyone has a preference for them because they are not disposable the way men are.
At the same time, women are just as disposable in modern society as men are, but by their own design. Their choice to value hedonistic lifestyles has dramatically dropped their gender value. It would be insane to argue that the current fatherless society is because women have intrinsic value, instead the government hyperinflates female value through funding and legislation while valuable males toss women around like disposable goods.
At the same time, women are just as disposable in modern society as men are
I'm sorry my friend but this is a cope. They may be the shittiest women to ever walk the face of the earth, but the biological reality of the reproductive bottleneck remains.
Again you’re blaming the result of societal conditioning. If women were actually treated equally as men they would never support the measures they do because they would be held to the same standards. This is the difference between equality and nepotism.
Women are scientifically proven to have it.
Holy botted downvotes, Batman.
Bad statement, women tend to be far more nepotistic but as for it being genetic or inherent is disputable. I would rather argue women are far more susceptible to operant and social conditioning compared to men as our testosterone makes us inherently disagreeable and competitive versus women whose hormones value a conformist ideologue to appease their emotional state.
Bro I detest Imp's psychosis as much as the next poster but he's correct in this instance.
It makes sense from an evolutionary psychology perspective. Women are the bottle neck on the propagation of the species so everyone has a preference for them because they are not disposable the way men are.
At the same time, women are just as disposable in modern society as men are, but by their own design. Their choice to value hedonistic lifestyles has dramatically dropped their gender value. It would be insane to argue that the current fatherless society is because women have intrinsic value, instead the government hyperinflates female value through funding and legislation while valuable males toss women around like disposable goods.
I'm sorry my friend but this is a cope. They may be the shittiest women to ever walk the face of the earth, but the biological reality of the reproductive bottleneck remains.
Even Wikipedia says women have an innate in-group bias. It's undeniable to even the most woke trash.
They just sweep it under the rug, like every other bad thing about women.
Again you’re blaming the result of societal conditioning. If women were actually treated equally as men they would never support the measures they do because they would be held to the same standards. This is the difference between equality and nepotism.
The reason they aren't held to standards is because they come down as a unit on anyone who tries.
Dude, Wikipedia has zero value being used as a source for anything other than as a source of gatekeeping.
Jews control banking, "oh look at the storm fags"
No one likes you. You can't hide the obvious anymore.
You people are really, really desperate to fake a consensus.
Have you considered the alternative possibility that people just disagree with you?
How can you disagree with the truth? It is simply factual.