It really has very little to do with men "being owed sex" by women. Most men don't really believe they're owed sex by women, or anyone for that matter. The big issue is that society has placed such an emphasis on premarital sex and random hookups and casual sex that young men are beginning to feel like if they aren't having sex they are missing out on an integral part of life, which is not the case.
Sure, there are definitely men out there who truly believe that women are simply there to please them and be their slaves, but that is not the case for the vast majority of men, even so-called incels. They have simply been led to believe that sex is an amazing, huge part of life, that it is integral to a normal life and, while it is important to a healthy relationship, it's not necessary to live a normal life.
It also comes back, in a way, to the destruction of traditional masculinity. If they can convince millions of men that sex is the only thing that matters, that it is the most important part of a relationship and of life, then that's all they're going to care about. They're not going to focus on other things such as learning new skills or trade or bettering themselves in some other way.
Of course, the funny part of all this is that by convincing men that sex is the only thing that matters, they are completely reducing women to only being important in a sexual way. Although, I suppose that's part of the plan too. After all, we can't have women being motherly figures or caring individuals in a household or in life in general. We have to have them choose careers that debase them and destroy their mental well-being. It really is all connected I guess. The destruction of the family unit, the destruction of traditional masculinity, the destruction of traditional femininity, the sexualization of children... It really does circle back to the destruction of traditional values in a way that lets them swoop in and replace traditional morality with some sort of perverted new age "progressive" morality.
Anyway, that's my $0.02
Oh, I beg to differ. When she starts flirting, it's horrifying beyond belief.
Interesting. Did she also admit that this was the reason she labeled him as creepy? Because I can imagine that it can also work the other way around. If you find a guy creepy, obviously he's not going to be attractive to you.
Once she thought about it she realized he didn’t seem like a bad person but just a guy she wasn’t attracted to. I’m average liking at best so women approaching me is a rarity of it happens at all but my point was that I agree with you but if a big woman like you describe approached me to flirt I’d like to think that o wouldn’t think her a bad or creepy person simply for not being attractive to me
Creepy is not necessarily a bad person! If women approached men as often as the other way around, I think men would have similar complaints as well. Maybe less because of the difference in physical strength.
I'm not as easily scared by someone who can't physically overpower me.
I get that. That’s also why I don’t get angry at the many rejections because I think women a lot of time feel the need to give a long flowery speech about how wonderful you are but they aren’t interested. I never give them a hard time because of the reasons you say. Although I do chuckle sometimes to myself at the probability that I meet every woman who isn’t looking for anything serious at the moment.
But I’m not disagreeing with you. I would personally a woman bluntly tell me I’m ugly over being a creep
Men just get rejected a lot. Even the 'attractive' ones.
Well, they're high in agreeableness, and possibly also high in fear. Though I doubt any woman is afraid of such a benign fellow like you.
Is it because you hate 'creep' or because you would rather hear the true reason and not filtered through something else?