Literally just wear a bra. Tits don't cause "back issues". My girlfriend has bigger ones than this. (don't go by the pic, she's wearing a padded bra, other pics of hers don't look that big).
Women make a lot of dumbass complaints that have no basis in reality. Big tits only way something like 3-4 lbs each. That's not enough to cause back problems, especially since you can just wear a bra to distribute the weight.
Women get reductions out of arrogance, stupidity, and convenience. This girl seems to be going trans.
No, I'm just tired of them looting the treasury while the world burns at their hands.
How come a demonstrable medical issue "looting the treasury" for women and not for you?
Also, "men icky" as stated by the OP as the reason
I'm not talking about the case of OP.
is not a valid medical issue, unless you count it as paranoia that requires psychiatric help.
You're one to talk about paranoia. But yes, obviously treatment for their insanity and paranoia, mostly self-inflicted, should not be covered by anyone else.
It may be justified when it is causing demonstrable medical issues, like back problems.
Literally just wear a bra. Tits don't cause "back issues". My girlfriend has bigger ones than this. (don't go by the pic, she's wearing a padded bra, other pics of hers don't look that big).
Women make a lot of dumbass complaints that have no basis in reality. Big tits only way something like 3-4 lbs each. That's not enough to cause back problems, especially since you can just wear a bra to distribute the weight.
Women get reductions out of arrogance, stupidity, and convenience. This girl seems to be going trans.
Oh my, the misogynist over here saying women tend to be biologically inferior and require reconstructive surgery.
Define 'inferior'.
Prone to biological deficiencies that require surgery to correct
Are you confused about whether surgery for demonstrable medical issues is covered by insurance? Or do you just oppose it for the Nazis?
"demonstrable medical issues", the same kind of "justification" often used to advocate for male circumcision in America.
The fact that an argument is fraudulently used in one instance, does not mean that there is no demonstrable medical issue ever.
How come a demonstrable medical issue "looting the treasury" for women and not for you?
I'm not talking about the case of OP.
You're one to talk about paranoia. But yes, obviously treatment for their insanity and paranoia, mostly self-inflicted, should not be covered by anyone else.