They also cook the books with the male/female player rates because they count mobile fuckstick game players as "gamers" and then tout the OMG LOOK AT ALL THE GIRL GAMERS! WOW! GIRLS PLAY GAMES TOO! tripe.
Not that it matters. If a survey says 85% of gamers are men, they say "This proves games are sexist, so we should have more women in games and game development."
If a survey says 55% of gamers are women, they say "This proves women are the most important audience for games, so we should have more women in games and game development to serve that audience."
They also cook the books with the male/female player rates because they count mobile fuckstick game players as "gamers" and then tout the OMG LOOK AT ALL THE GIRL GAMERS! WOW! GIRLS PLAY GAMES TOO! tripe.
Not that it matters. If a survey says 85% of gamers are men, they say "This proves games are sexist, so we should have more women in games and game development."
If a survey says 55% of gamers are women, they say "This proves women are the most important audience for games, so we should have more women in games and game development to serve that audience."
No matter the input, the output is the same.
"Heads I win, tails you lose" is a favorite game among the Critical Theory fart huffers.
I try