I don't need to read minds, feminists literally admit that they lie to gain power. It was one of the key points of the SCUM Manifesto (as advocated by the NYT),
Your mirror image would be a feminist who follows your comments on an hourly basis and who thinks that these represent the views of all men, and that anyone pretending otherwise is just lying because the School of the Imp told him to hide his views.
So yeah, you do need to read minds. Provide proof that this individual said "the world would be better without men" or shut up.
as well as being observable from all the female politicians who have switched sides after being elected.
Like Boris?
https://archive.ph/VoFYn - Think again. This is the co-founder of the movement that created coercive control praising JK for putting a quote on her book. She is very much still in the feminist circle.
I know she is a feminist. She said so much when sort of (but not really) repudiating Matt Walsh, which was disappointing. That said, she's definitely anti-regime.
How exactly are you going to win by hating on all women, which automatically alienates more than half the population, plus a substantial portion of men who are sane?
When they teach my comments in colleges across the world and my ideology is praised by national newspapers, they might have a point.
You do love your self-sealing hypotheses. Every wahmen is a feminist, every feminist wants to literally kill you, and if they say otherwise, well, they were told to lie!
You mean Carrie, right?
Did she 'switch'? Or was it Boris who 'switched', according to you? You voted for him.
She's not anti-regime. She's as anti-regime as the SA was anti-Nazism, and that's if you take her claims at face value, that she genuinely is worried about trannies. More likely that she's just the chosen target of a false flag because if any rabid ideologues did jump on, they can't achieve anything against her.
I'm not as good a mind-reader as you, which is why I couldn't tell that Kim Potter was looking for an excuse to kill a man, as you claimed.
Most certainly. And she isn't even a "TERF". She just dissented very mildly from regime dogma.
Your mirror image would be a feminist who follows your comments on an hourly basis and who thinks that these represent the views of all men, and that anyone pretending otherwise is just lying because the School of the Imp told him to hide his views.
So yeah, you do need to read minds. Provide proof that this individual said "the world would be better without men" or shut up.
Like Boris?
I know she is a feminist. She said so much when sort of (but not really) repudiating Matt Walsh, which was disappointing. That said, she's definitely anti-regime.
How exactly are you going to win by hating on all women, which automatically alienates more than half the population, plus a substantial portion of men who are sane?
You do love your self-sealing hypotheses. Every wahmen is a feminist, every feminist wants to literally kill you, and if they say otherwise, well, they were told to lie!
Did she 'switch'? Or was it Boris who 'switched', according to you? You voted for him.
...what?