Yeah, Russia should be taking over countries by fueling internal strife, funding revolutions, overthrowing the elected government and then installing a puppet government- you know like civilized countries do.
taking over countries by fueling internal strife, funding revolutions, overthrowing the elected government and then installing a puppet government- you know like civilized countries do.
I mean... That does involve orders of magnitude less death and destruction, so... yeah, pretty civilized.
They are doing that elsewhere(funding movements against fracking in Europe so they become dependent on them for energy, for example), and in Ukraine, but they failed so they've decided to invade.
I guess he has this crazy idea that unjustified military invasions are bad. Weird, I know!
Yeah, Russia should be taking over countries by fueling internal strife, funding revolutions, overthrowing the elected government and then installing a puppet government- you know like civilized countries do.
I mean... That does involve orders of magnitude less death and destruction, so... yeah, pretty civilized.
When you put it that way, you make it sound good.
Endless civil war causes less death and destruction? 🤨
Don't forget the deaths caused by the sudden pop-up coups in dozens of different countries!
They are doing that elsewhere(funding movements against fracking in Europe so they become dependent on them for energy, for example), and in Ukraine, but they failed so they've decided to invade.
What people post on the internet has not a fucking thing to do with the principle that wars of aggression are wrong.
It’s surprising to see these boomer neo-con takes on the conflict here.