We have to sides, one saying that "masks obviously do work", the other "masks don't work", both very certain about something that is very hard to establish.
They don’t, I made a post here during the beginning of the pandemic to explain why. Essentially the “studies” they conducted were so bad and fraudulent that somehow masking for Covid has a higher success chance than masking for the flu. The studies they pushed were all done in hospitals that also have negative ventilation, sanitation standards, and where workers were “fitted” with n-95s. Here’s a fun fact, if you have any facial hair to include long peach fuzz you aren’t “fitted” as the fine hairs actually breach the seal. I’ll let you guess how many hospital workers shaved their facial hair before putting on a n95.
They don’t, I made a post here during the beginning of the pandemic to explain why
Just because you make a post or an argument, doesn't mean that it's suddenly absolute and undisputed truth. You could do that for the other side as well.
Essentially the “studies” they conducted were so bad and fraudulent that somehow masking for Covid has a higher success chance than masking for the flu.
Yeah, there's a lot of stuff dodgy about the 'studies' that they push (as there is about studies in general with the replication crisis). But absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. I think that at most you can say that you are not persuaded that masks do work, or that there is no evidence for it, not that you have definitive proof that they do not work.
Here’s a fun fact, if you have any facial hair to include long peach fuzz you aren’t “fitted” as the fine hairs actually breach the seal
How very transphobic of you.
’ll let you guess how many hospital workers shaved their facial hair before putting on a n95.
"Work" is a nonsense term. It's so vague you could give any answer and be right. Do hammers work? Oh, you said yes? Well I meant as a spray on adhesive. Hammers don't work at all when you use them for that.
Do masks stop disgusting people from sneezing directly into the air? Yes, of course. Does this make them less likely to spread disease? Almost certainly. Is this effect strong enough to have a real impact at the population level? Doesn't look like it, but maybe. Will wearing a mask protect you from COVID? Barely, if at all. Does a non-sick person wearing a mask do anything at all? No.
"Work" is a nonsense term. It's so vague you could give any answer and be right. Do hammers work? Oh, you said yes? Well I meant as a spray on adhesive. Hammers don't work at all when you use them for that.
Yes, they do love their weaselwords. Safe and effective! What is the definition? By what standard are they 'safe'? Or 'effective'? Like Sowell said, everything is a success by sufficiently low standards, and a failure by sufficiently high standards.
Do masks stop disgusting people from sneezing directly into the air? Yes, of course. Does this make them less likely to spread disease? Almost certainly. Is this effect strong enough to have a real impact at the population level? Doesn't look like it, but maybe. Will wearing a mask protect you from COVID? Barely, if at all. Does a non-sick person wearing a mask do anything at all? No.
Excellent response, because you've obviously thought about the matter, and are not spreading mindless BS because you don't want to wear masks. I think this is unfortunately different from the vast majority of people, who either follow supposed authorities, or who just come to conclusions based on prejudices.
We identified 6 clinical studies (3 RCTs, 1 cohort study and 2 case–control studies) and 23 surrogate exposure studies. In the meta-analysis of the clinical studies, we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection
We included 15 randomised trials investigating the effect of masks (14 trials) in healthcare workers and the general population and of quarantine (1 trial). We found no trials testing eye protection. Compared to no masks there was no reduction of influenza-like illness (ILI) cases (Risk Ratio 0.93, 95%CI 0.83 to 1.05) or influenza (Risk Ratio 0.84, 95%CI 0.61-1.17) for masks in the general population, nor in healthcare workers (Risk Ratio 0.37, 95%CI 0.05 to 2.50). There was no difference between surgical masks and N95 respirators: for ILI (Risk Ratio 0.83, 95%CI 0.63 to 1.08), for influenza (Risk Ratio 1.02, 95%CI 0.73 to 1.43).
(There are loads more, but this one explains why masks don't work):
The faceseal leakage was found to represent the main
pathway for the submicrometer particles penetrating into the
respirator/mask. Thus, we believe that the priority in product
development should be given to establishing a better fit that
would eliminate or minimize the faceseal leakage.
Essentially, if you aren't wearing a full face seal, gloves, and a filtration unit, masks don't work.
I won't be responding to comments to this because I have other things to do. I imagine the people disputing more than a decade's worth of research observing the ineffectiveness of masks against respiratory pathogens will likely default to sophistry or cherrypicking for prevarication purposes, at which point it's just a waste of everybody's time.
We have to sides, one saying that "masks obviously do work", the other "masks don't work", both very certain about something that is very hard to establish.
Do masks work? I don't know.
They don’t, I made a post here during the beginning of the pandemic to explain why. Essentially the “studies” they conducted were so bad and fraudulent that somehow masking for Covid has a higher success chance than masking for the flu. The studies they pushed were all done in hospitals that also have negative ventilation, sanitation standards, and where workers were “fitted” with n-95s. Here’s a fun fact, if you have any facial hair to include long peach fuzz you aren’t “fitted” as the fine hairs actually breach the seal. I’ll let you guess how many hospital workers shaved their facial hair before putting on a n95.
Just because you make a post or an argument, doesn't mean that it's suddenly absolute and undisputed truth. You could do that for the other side as well.
Yeah, there's a lot of stuff dodgy about the 'studies' that they push (as there is about studies in general with the replication crisis). But absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. I think that at most you can say that you are not persuaded that masks do work, or that there is no evidence for it, not that you have definitive proof that they do not work.
How very transphobic of you.
Same percentage as there are (actual) women?
gradually I began to hate him
Much like Venice, a large portion is under water.
He certainly did suggest it.
actually women are the worst offenders as they never shave and most grow fine facial hairs
they do literally nothing to prevent the spread of viruses & you breathe in microplastics and chinese pollutants every time you wear one
"Work" is a nonsense term. It's so vague you could give any answer and be right. Do hammers work? Oh, you said yes? Well I meant as a spray on adhesive. Hammers don't work at all when you use them for that.
Do masks stop disgusting people from sneezing directly into the air? Yes, of course. Does this make them less likely to spread disease? Almost certainly. Is this effect strong enough to have a real impact at the population level? Doesn't look like it, but maybe. Will wearing a mask protect you from COVID? Barely, if at all. Does a non-sick person wearing a mask do anything at all? No.
Yes, they do love their weaselwords. Safe and effective! What is the definition? By what standard are they 'safe'? Or 'effective'? Like Sowell said, everything is a success by sufficiently low standards, and a failure by sufficiently high standards.
Excellent response, because you've obviously thought about the matter, and are not spreading mindless BS because you don't want to wear masks. I think this is unfortunately different from the vast majority of people, who either follow supposed authorities, or who just come to conclusions based on prejudices.
Findings:
More corroboration over the years (dating back a decade)
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.18.21257385v1.full
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19216002/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15340662/
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection/article/face-masks-to-prevent-transmission-of-influenza-virus-a-systematic-%20review/64D368496EBDE0AFCC6639CCC9D8BC05
https://www.cmaj.ca/content/188/8/567
Findings:
A few more:
https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/65/11/1934/4068747?login=false
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5779801/
Findings:
Findings:
(There are loads more, but this one explains why masks don't work):
Essentially, if you aren't wearing a full face seal, gloves, and a filtration unit, masks don't work.
I won't be responding to comments to this because I have other things to do. I imagine the people disputing more than a decade's worth of research observing the ineffectiveness of masks against respiratory pathogens will likely default to sophistry or cherrypicking for prevarication purposes, at which point it's just a waste of everybody's time.
If a person is ugly, they for certain do work for something.