How the Democrats turned "science" into left wing activism [Stossel]
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (49)
sorted by:
The same way they corrupt everything. Because we didn't gatekeep it.
This is a false narrative, the left wins for two reasons they use pathos exclusively for debate and they take any openings they get using pathos to remove ethos and logos. This is why women and children (but I repeat myself) are the party majority. Every single movement they’ve had has been either scawwy thing! or bad thing!
It only matters that the language they use manipulated women more easily... because women are allowed to vote. Because we didn't gatekeep political participation like the founders wanted us to.
Some women are rational and logical and smart, but the majority of women are emotionally driven and easy to manipulate.
If you want to restrict the right to vote, you need to always make sure that the following people can vote:
The large majority of people willing to take up arms and fight. This is why the Taliban won in Afghanistan. The FIGHTING population was not represented by the government.
All the economic growth powers/elites, because without them you don't have GDP growth and economic strength.
Wagies, most women, the poor (with some exception for fighters), the fat, the young, etc can all get fucked. Actually having a test to determine voter eligibility would be based, having criteria like income/assets, veteran status, etc would ensure that the government serves the stakeholders not the leeches.
Precisely this. There is no future in any society where the parasite class wield political power.
Make voting restricted to property owners, with ONE vote per household.
Give people property for serving in the military.
Done.
If you base public participation in part on economic power, then you have to carefully control who has economic power. This would probably require expulsion of Jews from the body politic and from the financial sector.
100%. Repeal the 19th.
Because they used pathos, there was nothing rational or ethical about giving women the right to vote without any responsibility, in fact it was the opposite of both ethics and logic.
Because the people arguing for it weren't all shot on the spot. It all goes back to failing to gatekeep, even society itself.
They win because billionaires are on their side. See the trans movement. It's widely unpopular but gets pushed anyway because the Pritzkers, "Martine" Rothblatt, etc. want it to happen.
It's this one. I mean the arguments about gatekeeping and emotional women aren't wrong, but it's not "we" that failed, it's the elites. Even if you think people should have started taking heads long ago, the idea of revolutions of plebs against the Powers That Be is a myth. We have to have elites on our side.
Libs take over everything that conservatives don't fight for.
Since conservatives don't lust for power like libs do and just want to live normal lives, the libs end up flooding all the key strategic places of power they covet and take them over.
Libs take over everything because so called "conservatives" never conserve anything. Buckley was a leftist infiltrator and probably a sodomite. His ideology constantly gives ground to the left because like any secular ideal it is morally bankrupt.
Conservatives grew fat in their overconfidence that the US would always be a "center right" country, and so they sat back and ignored the Left's long march through the institutions, and now we are finally paying the price and people are starting to wake up.
"Long march through the institutions" is overrated. Wealthy people who used to back conservatives simply became more liberal as a result of "progress" and globalization. If the ruling class truly opposed the people or ideas "marching" through the institutions, they would have been crushed them.