Biden lied to the public and claimed that Putin hadn't made up his mind, when US intelligence and the military had confirmed the invasion would definitely move forward and communicated this to Biden in a major October 2021 meeting. Biden was told exactly how the invasion would go down, and exactly where the thrusts would be - all of which were accurate (and obvious based on the satellite-confirmed disposition of forces). The only thing the US intel/military got wrong was in thinking the invasion would be launched earlier in the winter to avoid the Rasputitsa. Late Feb was not an ideal date because the mud came soon after.
France and Germany were gigacucks and basically refused to believe Putin would invade, and undermined any efforts to punish/deter Russia. By contrast, the UK and Baltics were ready to roll from day 1.
The Biden admin withheld evidence from Ukraine and went with a "just trust me, bro" which didn't change minds or convince the Ukrainians that Putin wasn't bluffing. One of the reasons the UK was on board was that the US had close intel sharing with them.
Zelensky purposely downplayed the invasion risk even after being told it was a certainty, because he was afraid of causing a panic and hurting the UKR economy and people leaving the country so they wouldn't be drafted. UKR went into the war a lot less prepared than it should have been because of this.
US diplomats all reported that the Russians were just bullshitting and had 0 interest in a diplomatic solution. The only reason for the whole diplomatic charade was to appease the French and Germans.
Russia thought the sanctions would be weak, and that the West would get outraged and stomp their feet while doing little else, and Russia was essentially correct on this point. Again, France and Germany are the primary reasons for this.
The Biden admin was deliberately ambiguous on sanctions, which Russia correctly interpreted as weakness and bluffing, again because the Biden admin was afraid that France and Germany would refuse to go along with any significant sanctions.
As for the depths of French cuckoldry:
On Feb. 20, Macron called Putin and asked him to agree to a meeting in Geneva with Biden. The conversation led the French president to believe that Putin was finally willing to seek a settlement. “It’s a proposal that merits to be taken into account,” Putin said... Macron pressed the Russian leader. “But can we say, today, at the end of this conversation, that we agree in principle? I would like a clear answer from you on that score. I understand your resistance to setting a date. But are you ready to move forward and say, today, ‘I would like a [face-to-face] meeting with the Americans, then expanded to the Europeans’? Or not?” Putin didn’t commit and appeared to have more-pressing matters at hand. “To be perfectly frank with you, I wanted to go [play] ice hockey, because right now I’m at the gym. But before starting my workout, let me assure you, I will first call my advisers.”
Imagine being the leader of France and being like "Putin, I need an answer, yes or no?!!?" and Putin is just like "Ehhh imma go play hockey, I'll call you back sometime." LOL.
Macron is heard laughing in delight as he hangs up. The French president and his advisers thought they had a breakthrough. Macron’s diplomatic adviser, Emmanuel Bonne, even danced.
Macron is the simp who gets told "I see you as a friend" by his crush, and thinks it means she loves him.
But the following day, in a televised address, Putin officially recognized two separatist Ukrainian provinces in Donbas, including territory controlled by Kyiv, as independent states.
It's not the American fault that Ukrainiane were ruled by a bunch of pacifist hippy idiots, who were angry about being desperately warned they're about to be murdered.
A pacifist hippy idiot doesn't repeatedly shell civilian targets for years. Nor do they amass tens of thousands of troops just outside neighboring regions.
Can you give me some exact dates and places of when and where did they "repeatedly shell civilian targets for years [sic]" during the period of his entire presidency until 2022, the period when practically no civilians died in active hostilities?
(A few died and more were injured, almost all from old unexploded munitions and mines. On both sides of the line of contact.)
Also, what were these mysterious "neighbouring regions".
To help you, here's for example the last months of 2021, when Russia was preparing for the full scale war over the lies that you just repeated:
December 2021
From 1 to 31 December 2021, Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) recorded six civilian casualties: one killed (a woman) and five injured (all men). One man was injured by light weapons fire in territory controlled by the self-proclaimed ‘Donetsk people’s republic’, one man was injured by an anti-personnel mine in Government-controlled part of Donetsk region, one woman was killed and two men were injured as a result of ERW handling in Government-controlled part of Donetsk region, and one man was injured as a result of ERW handling in territory controlled by the self-proclaimed ‘Luhansk people’s republic’.
November 2021
From 1 to 30 November 2021, OHCHR recorded four civilian casualties (all injured): two men and two women. All of them were caused by active hostilities (shelling and SALW fire): one in territory controlled by the self-proclaimed ‘Donetsk people’s republic’, one in territory controlled by the self-proclaimed ‘Luhansk people’s republic’, one in Government-controlled part of Donetsk region, and one in Government-controlled part of Luhansk region.
Total civilian casualties in 2021
The total number of civilian casualties recorded by OHCHR in 2021 has totaled 110: 25 killed (16 men, two women, three boys, one girl and three adults whose sex is not yet known) and 85 injured (56 men, 21 women, six boys and two girls), a 26.2 per cent decrease compared with 2020 (149: 26 killed and 123 injured), and the lowest annual civilian casualties for the entire conflict period.
Lying liars will never stop lying. Plus, more than 80% of people are sub-intelligent, so it's hard to know if they're defending jewish attacks on Russia because they're jews, or if it's just because they're so stupid.
Then I actually reopened https://www.osce.org/special-monitoring-mission-to-ukraine/512092 and I'm really confused what did you want me to prove with the exchanges of fire with Russia's forces already in Ukraine, who were originally scheduled to attack just days later on 16 but then delayed to 24.
And just whatever did you think it had to do with "repeatedly shelling civilian targets for years". Because there was nothing to do with any civilians.
The Mission monitored the operation and repair of critical civilian infrastructure.
The SMM continued to follow up on the situation for civilians, including at entry-exit checkpoints and corresponding checkpoints of the armed formations in Donetsk and Luhansk regions.
Or maybe did you actually mean this? Very strange.
You can count all the civilians killed by any sort of active hostilities in the entire 2021 on your hands (if not just 1 hand) and that's all those killed on both sides and by both sides. Similar for 2020, 2019, 2018, and each of these years it was significantly fewer and fewer since the would-be final ceasefire had began back in February 2015. (Which was after several thousand died, in less than 1 year and not any "years".) And 2017 and 2016 and even 2015 too for that matter, each year less and less of any sort of conflict since 2014.
By 2021, when Putin decided to attack, practically all was happening was soldiers on both sides occasionally sniping each other in their respective trenches. Including Putin's very own FSB snipers: https://twitter.com/ralee85/status/1258711127166509058
Clicked the very first one and instantly saw "2022", after which I closed the tab. Maybe you got confused somehow, but I asked regarding your claims of "repeatedly shelling civilian targets for years [sic]" during all these years between 2018 and 2022. The Russian preparation for the invasion began full scale in 2021 (the Zapad "exercises" that didn't end), when I've been following it live.
So...I show you several days of the Ukrainian forces shelling civilian targets prior to the 24th of February (the date of the Russian invasion)...and you just ignore it because it happened in 2022?
Are you saying that Russia opened fire on the Ukrainians before February 24th? Show me the evidence of that if so.
No, you didn't. I clicked the first link, which was about incidents between soldiers (and in one case Russian forces firing on an UAV of the ceasefire observers and also jamming them) and nothing about any "Ukrainian forces shelling civilian targets" whatsoever. Should I click the second one? Or was it in the third? Each one(s), exactly?
Russia first opened fire in March of 2014, which is also when they killed the first Ukrainian soldier (naval officer taken prisoner and then murdered in Crimea with gunshot wounds) and the first civilians too (multiple Tatar activists disappeared and later found dead or not found at all). Then beginning in April of 2014 they killed thousands of Ukrainians in the east of the country before February 2022, but almost all of them also before March 2015.
They also killed three hundred of mostly Dutch foreign civilians. In just one day.
Less than 1,000 people (almost all of them soldiers) on both sides died 2016-2022. That's 6 full years, with usually just no one at all dying on any given day, and every year it was less than in the year prior.
Since February 24 the same hundreds of people is a daily death toll, every single day, and with a whole lot more civilians between them. Many of whom are being deliberately murdered.
Actually just the first link is all I need. Just show me which one of these paragraphs did you so creatively and also very specifically interpret as "several days of Ukrainian forces shelling civilian targets":
In Donetsk region, between the evenings of 11 and 13 February, the Mission recorded 261 ceasefire violations, including 50 explosions. In the previous reporting period, it recorded 114 ceasefire violations in the region.
In Luhansk region, between the evenings of 11 and 13 February, the SMM recorded 114 ceasefire violations, including 24 explosions. In the previous reporting period, it recorded 258 ceasefire violations in the region.
Small-arms fire was assessed as directed at an SMM mini-unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in non-government-controlled Kalmiuske, Donetsk region.*
The Mission continued monitoring the disengagement areas near Stanytsia Luhanska, Zolote and Petrivske.
The SMM monitored the operation and repair of critical civilian infrastructure.
The Mission continued following up on the situation of civilians, including at five entry-exit checkpoints and four corresponding checkpoints of the armed formations in Donetsk and Luhansk regions.
The SMM monitored the security situation in east and south-east Kherson region.
The Mission’s freedom of movement continued to be restricted, including at a checkpoint of the armed formations near Kreminets in Luhansk region. Its UAVs again encountered instances of GPS signal interference, assessed as caused by probable jamming and jamming.*
It's the many videos of various military parades held by Russian forces in Donetsk city over all these years.
It's military parades, but also attended by crowds of specifically pro-Russia civilians - and even by all the "separatist" leaders (military and otherwise). You seem to think they would surely go and shell then, right?
Or, for example, the funerals of slain Russian commanders, practically also military parades and with lots of civs and they do want to hit the civs, you apparently think so.
Well, you see, Ukrainian forces have held the suburbs like Piski and Avdiivka a few kilometers away (Piski especially just across Donetsk Airport), all that time. In fact, they still do!
Now ask yourself the following questions:
Can you even imagine a more juicy target than that if someone wanted to hit just any remotely civilian target on purpose?
Why are they never being shelled?
Why are they not at all even afraid of being shelled (or otherwise attacked, like hit with a ballistic missile)?
Why none of the buildings ever bear any damage from shelling on any other date?
If you need a visual reference, this is how a city in Ukraine looks like after just few weeks (not "years") of shelling: https://youtu.be/MDVLmOVDaOY
Then go and call whoever have lied to you so much a niggerfaggot, which they are.
Russia baited the dumb Georgian president to attack while it had it's whole force right over the border ready to jump in, and he stupidly took the bait and got rolled.
The point of the Georgian invasion was to secure the breakaway areas for Russia. Nothing whatsoever to do with NATO. Georgia isn't even in europe. The whole NATO thing was a post hoc rationalization Putin pulled out of his ass after invading Ukraine in 2014.
Also NATO thing being a last minute Casus belli is moronic. Everyone knows Russia would be hostile to any NATO countries bordering them. They see NATO as an anti Russian organization. They kinda has a history of fighting anti Russian alliances and are very weary of that.
Are you stupid? "Euromaiden happening" in no way changes the fact that Russia invaded Ukraine in 2014.
Also NATO thing being a last minute Casus belli is moronic.
It is moronic, but not in the way you mean. It's moronic on the part of Russia to come up with such a stupid pretext for a naked war of aggression.
They see NATO as an anti Russian organization.
It is. It's there primarily to stop russian aggression.
They kinda has a history of fighting anti Russian alliances and are very weary of that.
Cool. Then their shitty, poor country can get humiliated and lose yet another war of aggression. Keep clinging to the glory days of the bread lines of the USSR, commiecucks.
repeating obvious lies pushed by the Russian state in order to create a pretext for a naked war of aggression makes you either supremely gullible and stupid, or supremely biased to the point of ignoring obvious realities to push a false narrative.
When a 3rd of the army invading you made up with your fellow citizens then you might be loosing the plot.
Your mean people from the occupied donbass forced into service against their will, given old outdated weapons and used as cannon fodder by the Russians? They have never been anywhere close to 1/3 of the total Russian invasion force.
Anyone who paid attention the past 8 years see both sides of the conflict. Doesn't take Russia propaganda to see Ukraine is prepping for a fat L with that porcupine defense. 🦔🛡
So 8 years of public knowledge and news report from all political spectrum the past 8 years is Russia propaganda? You obviously don't know shit about this conflict if you calling this naked aggression.
Just wondering if Kosovo deserve to exist considering they are a breakaway republic asking for foreign help to guarantee their independence.
don't talk down to me. I know a lot more than you do
do not disrespect my time by posting a link to a voluminous wiki page without identifying and quoting the specific text that you believe supports your argument. it is not my job to waste my time reading through a large text doing your job for you trying to look for whatever part - if any - you think helps you.
I fully read through your link, every nook and cranny, every word, and can confidently announce that it 100% supports my position, and is 100% against your claim. I don't know why you would link it as proof of your claim. you clearly haven't read it.
It does not. You are a liar. If you are not lying, then you can quote the exact text that supports you. You will not, and cannot, because the link does not support you at all.
lol I told you to learn something, I didn't say I'd force-feed you an education.
Stop blabbering and actually read the link. Sound out the words one at a time if you have to. The part that backs up what I said in in the goddamn second and third paragraphs of the summary you absolute clod.
You obviously have autism, and your goal in coming online is to try to feel intelligent and above others even though in reality, you are an absolute idiot.
I've wasted too much time on you already. retard blocked.
It's not his fault Ukraine and Europe were told and everyone refused to believe, not even after they told literally the entire world publicly (remember this?). Including Zelensky and his crew refuting it also publicly and condemning "false rumors designed to create panic and economic disruption".
We had also been trying to get the Germans off Russian gas since at least Obama. They told us to go fuck ourselves until after Russia had invaded. When Trump said that Europe isn't pulling its weight in NATO he actually understated the problem. They were undermining the alliance for what were essentially bribes. It's not all that different from our corporations selling us out to Winnie the Pooh.
A bunch of high ranking Germans laughed at Trump when he said Germany was too dependent on Russian gas. It was live on TV when they did that. I bet they all regret it now.
And the American media presented it as "look, DRUMPF is so stupid that even foreign officials snicker and make silly faces while looking at each other when he speaks to them in public".
Biden lied to the public and claimed that Putin hadn't made up his mind, when US intelligence and the military had confirmed the invasion would definitely move forward and communicated this to Biden in a major October 2021 meeting. Biden was told exactly how the invasion would go down, and exactly where the thrusts would be - all of which were accurate (and obvious based on the satellite-confirmed disposition of forces). The only thing the US intel/military got wrong was in thinking the invasion would be launched earlier in the winter to avoid the Rasputitsa. Late Feb was not an ideal date because the mud came soon after.
France and Germany were gigacucks and basically refused to believe Putin would invade, and undermined any efforts to punish/deter Russia. By contrast, the UK and Baltics were ready to roll from day 1.
The Biden admin withheld evidence from Ukraine and went with a "just trust me, bro" which didn't change minds or convince the Ukrainians that Putin wasn't bluffing. One of the reasons the UK was on board was that the US had close intel sharing with them.
Zelensky purposely downplayed the invasion risk even after being told it was a certainty, because he was afraid of causing a panic and hurting the UKR economy and people leaving the country so they wouldn't be drafted. UKR went into the war a lot less prepared than it should have been because of this.
US diplomats all reported that the Russians were just bullshitting and had 0 interest in a diplomatic solution. The only reason for the whole diplomatic charade was to appease the French and Germans.
Russia thought the sanctions would be weak, and that the West would get outraged and stomp their feet while doing little else, and Russia was essentially correct on this point. Again, France and Germany are the primary reasons for this.
The Biden admin was deliberately ambiguous on sanctions, which Russia correctly interpreted as weakness and bluffing, again because the Biden admin was afraid that France and Germany would refuse to go along with any significant sanctions.
As for the depths of French cuckoldry:
Imagine being the leader of France and being like "Putin, I need an answer, yes or no?!!?" and Putin is just like "Ehhh imma go play hockey, I'll call you back sometime." LOL.
Macron is the simp who gets told "I see you as a friend" by his crush, and thinks it means she loves him.
The bottom line is that the American intelligence was right all along, meanwhile just look at this in February, literally 1 week before the attack: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/us-warnings-russia-invade-frustrate-ukrainians-rcna16358
It's not the American fault that Ukrainiane were ruled by a bunch of pacifist hippy idiots, who were angry about being desperately warned they're about to be murdered.
A pacifist hippy idiot doesn't repeatedly shell civilian targets for years. Nor do they amass tens of thousands of troops just outside neighboring regions.
Can you give me some exact dates and places of when and where did they "repeatedly shell civilian targets for years [sic]" during the period of his entire presidency until 2022, the period when practically no civilians died in active hostilities?
(A few died and more were injured, almost all from old unexploded munitions and mines. On both sides of the line of contact.)
Also, what were these mysterious "neighbouring regions".
To help you, here's for example the last months of 2021, when Russia was preparing for the full scale war over the lies that you just repeated:
https://ukraine.un.org/en/168060-conflict-related-civilian-casualties-ukraine
I say you should stop listening to whoever lied to you, and perhaps tell them they're faggots.
https://www.osce.org/special-monitoring-mission-to-ukraine/512092
https://www.osce.org/special-monitoring-mission-to-ukraine/512272
https://www.osce.org/special-monitoring-mission-to-ukraine/512326
https://www.osce.org/special-monitoring-mission-to-ukraine/512506
https://www.osce.org/special-monitoring-mission-to-ukraine/512605
https://www.osce.org/special-monitoring-mission-to-ukraine/512629
I suppose these events never happened then according to you? There are several more reports just like these in the days leading up to the invasion.
Lying liars will never stop lying. Plus, more than 80% of people are sub-intelligent, so it's hard to know if they're defending jewish attacks on Russia because they're jews, or if it's just because they're so stupid.
Then I actually reopened https://www.osce.org/special-monitoring-mission-to-ukraine/512092 and I'm really confused what did you want me to prove with the exchanges of fire with Russia's forces already in Ukraine, who were originally scheduled to attack just days later on 16 but then delayed to 24.
And just whatever did you think it had to do with "repeatedly shelling civilian targets for years". Because there was nothing to do with any civilians.
Or maybe did you actually mean this? Very strange.
You can count all the civilians killed by any sort of active hostilities in the entire 2021 on your hands (if not just 1 hand) and that's all those killed on both sides and by both sides. Similar for 2020, 2019, 2018, and each of these years it was significantly fewer and fewer since the would-be final ceasefire had began back in February 2015. (Which was after several thousand died, in less than 1 year and not any "years".) And 2017 and 2016 and even 2015 too for that matter, each year less and less of any sort of conflict since 2014.
By 2021, when Putin decided to attack, practically all was happening was soldiers on both sides occasionally sniping each other in their respective trenches. Including Putin's very own FSB snipers: https://twitter.com/ralee85/status/1258711127166509058
Clicked the very first one and instantly saw "2022", after which I closed the tab. Maybe you got confused somehow, but I asked regarding your claims of "repeatedly shelling civilian targets for years [sic]" during all these years between 2018 and 2022. The Russian preparation for the invasion began full scale in 2021 (the Zapad "exercises" that didn't end), when I've been following it live.
So...I show you several days of the Ukrainian forces shelling civilian targets prior to the 24th of February (the date of the Russian invasion)...and you just ignore it because it happened in 2022?
Are you saying that Russia opened fire on the Ukrainians before February 24th? Show me the evidence of that if so.
No, you didn't. I clicked the first link, which was about incidents between soldiers (and in one case Russian forces firing on an UAV of the ceasefire observers and also jamming them) and nothing about any "Ukrainian forces shelling civilian targets" whatsoever. Should I click the second one? Or was it in the third? Each one(s), exactly?
Russia first opened fire in March of 2014, which is also when they killed the first Ukrainian soldier (naval officer taken prisoner and then murdered in Crimea with gunshot wounds) and the first civilians too (multiple Tatar activists disappeared and later found dead or not found at all). Then beginning in April of 2014 they killed thousands of Ukrainians in the east of the country before February 2022, but almost all of them also before March 2015.
They also killed three hundred of mostly Dutch foreign civilians. In just one day.
Less than 1,000 people (almost all of them soldiers) on both sides died 2016-2022. That's 6 full years, with usually just no one at all dying on any given day, and every year it was less than in the year prior.
Since February 24 the same hundreds of people is a daily death toll, every single day, and with a whole lot more civilians between them. Many of whom are being deliberately murdered.
Actually just the first link is all I need. Just show me which one of these paragraphs did you so creatively and also very specifically interpret as "several days of Ukrainian forces shelling civilian targets":
And hey, you know what? I thought of something to show you in a very easy way.
Look at just any video here: https://youtube.com/results?sp=mAEA&search_query=Donetsk+military+parade
It's the many videos of various military parades held by Russian forces in Donetsk city over all these years.
It's military parades, but also attended by crowds of specifically pro-Russia civilians - and even by all the "separatist" leaders (military and otherwise). You seem to think they would surely go and shell then, right?
Or, for example, the funerals of slain Russian commanders, practically also military parades and with lots of civs and they do want to hit the civs, you apparently think so.
Well, you see, Ukrainian forces have held the suburbs like Piski and Avdiivka a few kilometers away (Piski especially just across Donetsk Airport), all that time. In fact, they still do!
Now ask yourself the following questions:
Can you even imagine a more juicy target than that if someone wanted to hit just any remotely civilian target on purpose?
Why are they never being shelled?
Why are they not at all even afraid of being shelled (or otherwise attacked, like hit with a ballistic missile)?
Why none of the buildings ever bear any damage from shelling on any other date?
If you need a visual reference, this is how a city in Ukraine looks like after just few weeks (not "years") of shelling: https://youtu.be/MDVLmOVDaOY
Then go and call whoever have lied to you so much a niggerfaggot, which they are.
We knew Russia would invade Ukraine in 2008 when it invaded Georgia under the exact same circumstances:
We wanted Georgia in NATO, Russia destabalized Georgia so it wouldn't qualify, we said it could join NATO anyway, and Russia invaded to stop it.
The sequence of events is exactly the same, and exactly the same outcome. But I guess you can't blame an alzheimers for forgetting history.
NATO had absolutely nothing to do with Georgia.
Russia baited the dumb Georgian president to attack while it had it's whole force right over the border ready to jump in, and he stupidly took the bait and got rolled.
The point of the Georgian invasion was to secure the breakaway areas for Russia. Nothing whatsoever to do with NATO. Georgia isn't even in europe. The whole NATO thing was a post hoc rationalization Putin pulled out of his ass after invading Ukraine in 2014.
So let's just ignore Euromaiden happening
Also NATO thing being a last minute Casus belli is moronic. Everyone knows Russia would be hostile to any NATO countries bordering them. They see NATO as an anti Russian organization. They kinda has a history of fighting anti Russian alliances and are very weary of that.
Are you stupid? "Euromaiden happening" in no way changes the fact that Russia invaded Ukraine in 2014.
It is moronic, but not in the way you mean. It's moronic on the part of Russia to come up with such a stupid pretext for a naked war of aggression.
It is. It's there primarily to stop russian aggression.
Cool. Then their shitty, poor country can get humiliated and lose yet another war of aggression. Keep clinging to the glory days of the bread lines of the USSR, commiecucks.
Seeing two side of s conflict doesn't make me a commie.
Also
Cope harder. When a 3rd of the army invading you made up with your fellow citizens then you might be loosing the plot.
repeating obvious lies pushed by the Russian state in order to create a pretext for a naked war of aggression makes you either supremely gullible and stupid, or supremely biased to the point of ignoring obvious realities to push a false narrative.
Your mean people from the occupied donbass forced into service against their will, given old outdated weapons and used as cannon fodder by the Russians? They have never been anywhere close to 1/3 of the total Russian invasion force.
Anyone who paid attention the past 8 years see both sides of the conflict. Doesn't take Russia propaganda to see Ukraine is prepping for a fat L with that porcupine defense. 🦔🛡
So 8 years of public knowledge and news report from all political spectrum the past 8 years is Russia propaganda? You obviously don't know shit about this conflict if you calling this naked aggression.
Just wondering if Kosovo deserve to exist considering they are a breakaway republic asking for foreign help to guarantee their independence.
Still waiting for a reply.
Like when Russia told the world the Ukranians were doing a Hamas and using human shields and setting up bases in schools.
Then it turns out to be true. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/08/ukraine-ukrainian-fighting-tactics-endanger-civilians/
"Georgia's powerful northern neighbor, Russia, has opposed the closer ties, including those expressed at the 2008 Bucharest summit where NATO members promised that Georgia would eventually join the organization."*
What's that silence? You're not even man enough to admit you were wrong?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia%E2%80%93NATO_relations
Learn something.
don't talk down to me. I know a lot more than you do
do not disrespect my time by posting a link to a voluminous wiki page without identifying and quoting the specific text that you believe supports your argument. it is not my job to waste my time reading through a large text doing your job for you trying to look for whatever part - if any - you think helps you.
I fully read through your link, every nook and cranny, every word, and can confidently announce that it 100% supports my position, and is 100% against your claim. I don't know why you would link it as proof of your claim. you clearly haven't read it.
It would be like me telling you. Learn something: https://thekingsbible.com/
learn to argue properly.
It says exactly what I said in my comment.
I provided evidence to back up the claims I made, you didn't because you can't.
It does not. You are a liar. If you are not lying, then you can quote the exact text that supports you. You will not, and cannot, because the link does not support you at all.
lol I told you to learn something, I didn't say I'd force-feed you an education.
Stop blabbering and actually read the link. Sound out the words one at a time if you have to. The part that backs up what I said in in the goddamn second and third paragraphs of the summary you absolute clod.
You obviously have autism, and your goal in coming online is to try to feel intelligent and above others even though in reality, you are an absolute idiot.
I've wasted too much time on you already. retard blocked.
It's not his fault Ukraine and Europe were told and everyone refused to believe, not even after they told literally the entire world publicly (remember this?). Including Zelensky and his crew refuting it also publicly and condemning "false rumors designed to create panic and economic disruption".
Biden is right here (from June): https://www.rferl.org/a/biden-zelenskiy-ukraine-warnings-russian-invasion/31893444.html because I remember this happening live.
And this is what did happened then (in January): https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60174684
We had also been trying to get the Germans off Russian gas since at least Obama. They told us to go fuck ourselves until after Russia had invaded. When Trump said that Europe isn't pulling its weight in NATO he actually understated the problem. They were undermining the alliance for what were essentially bribes. It's not all that different from our corporations selling us out to Winnie the Pooh.
A bunch of high ranking Germans laughed at Trump when he said Germany was too dependent on Russian gas. It was live on TV when they did that. I bet they all regret it now.
And the American media presented it as "look, DRUMPF is so stupid that even foreign officials snicker and make silly faces while looking at each other when he speaks to them in public".