I'm describing specifically leftist arguments where it's perfectly ok to bitch about white people (collectively, as a whole) but not ok to bitch about Jews (collectively, as a whole) without being Hitler.
OK. But this applies equally to every group other than whites, men, heterosexuals - their betes noirs. You can't even bitch about Asians, and they get screwed over bigly by the wokies.
It's ok to criticize Israel specifically for oppressing the poor Palestinians, but blame the state of Israel for a false flag attack or stealing technology and go directly to Hitler.
It's OK to criticize Israel if you're from the left. It's not OK to criticize Israel if you're from the right. It's as simple as that. It's hierarchy.
I'd speculate that Jews are demonstrably more nepotistic than non-Jewish white people in general
It's not really speculation. Any tightly knit community will look like that. E.g. Sowell describes how Jewish traders sometimes avoided contract and lawyer costs by trading without contracts, due to the trust that existed between them. Of course you're going to trade with a fellow Jew whom you (at least think you can) trust rather than with an outsider.
and that accounts for a lot of the types of positions that account for vast wealth accumulation
That wealth has to exist in the first place though. It didn't come dropping out of the sky. Same with the wealth of the overseas Chinese. They are the ones who created that wealth.
Personally, I think people should be free to bitch about whoever they want for whatever reason and the response to the crazies should be, "eh, maybe, but prob'ly not." But we clearly don't have that.
Just search FIRE's website, and you can find more.
Of course you're going to trade with a fellow Jew whom you (at least think you can) trust rather than with an outsider.
If they consider us outsiders, maybe we should start returning favor eh?
I think it's a diversion.
How so? The discussion on Jews just falls under the umbrella of what it means for white countries to become multi-ethnic and/or multicultural, just as discussions on black crime, for example, do.
Whites have a right to discuss our future. White Americans and many Europeans face a precarious demographic situation. We need to be discussing how this happened to us, what challenges we will face going forward, and what we are going to do to survive through it. These are the most important questions for white people in every country facing the demographic cliff.
This discussion is going to happen whether "anti-idpol" people (who nearly, down to every last man, are Zionists who support Jewish idpol despite their fraudulent self-disgnation) want it to or not. Maybe not here, maybe not now, but the question, "what is to become of white Americans (or British, etc.)?" will be answered, and it will be white people answering it, even if our numbers dwindled quite badly before enough of our own get off the bench and into the game.
You can get on board or get the fuck out of the way.
Consider? Not particularly impressive influence in a Jew-heavy state like New York.
If they consider us outsiders, maybe we should start returning favor eh?
See, you won't, because that won't work. Not until whites are a tightly knit community, as they are in South Africa. I'm 10,000% sure that whites in South Africa would rather trade with each other than with other groups.
This discussion is going to happen whether "anti-idpol" people (who nearly, down to every last man, are Zionists who support Jewish idpol despite their fraudulent self-disgnation)
I'm anti-IDPol, and yes, I'm a Zionist (believe that Israel has a right to exist). I support Israel's right to keep outsiders out, and I support my own country keeping outsiders out, and yours if it so desires.
You can get on board or get the fuck out of the way.
Consider? Not particularly impressive influence in a Jew-heavy state like New York.
Like I said, search FIRE's site, and you can find plenty of examples.
See, you won't, because that won't work. Not until whites are a tightly knit community
These go hand in hand. You can't be a tightly knit community without seeing outsiders as what they are.
I'm anti-IDPol, and yes, I'm a Zionist (believe that Israel has a right to exist).
You guys always pull this shit. Finish the sentence. it should be, "I support Israel's right to exist as a country that maintains an ethnically Jewish majority complete with DNA testing for immigration." In other words, you support defining a country by idpol while calling yourself anit-idpol.
Like I said, search FIRE's site, and you can find plenty of examples.
The one you cited wasn't particularly good.
These go hand in hand. You can't be a tightly knit community without seeing outsiders as what they are.
How come the outsiders are always the bad guys?
You guys always pull this shit. Finish the sentence. it should be, "I support Israel's right to exist as a country that maintains an ethnically Jewish majority complete with DNA testing for immigration."
Yes? Sounds reasonable to me. If France decides to let in people, why not Huguenots who moved to South Africa?
In other words, you support defining a country by idpol while calling yourself anit-idpol.
That's just called a 'country'. In what other way can you define a national state?
white identity politics
What's the likelihood that someone who is not white will get on board with 'white identity politics'? And for that matter, why would I need to 'get out of the way'?
I'm just going to roll my eyes here. I'm not religious, and the quote isn't exact, but I'll just say, "by its fruits shall you know it."
Yes, technically people would probably look at you funny if you started ranting about a global cabal of gays or Buddhists that were running the world for their benefit, but they probably wouldn't just assume that you're Hitler.
I'm not going to continue on the other threads because they're so far off topic. I do find your agreement with the JQ-types to be surprising though.
Yes, technically people would probably look at you funny if you started ranting about a global cabal of gays or Buddhists that were running the world for their benefit, but they probably wouldn't just assume that you're Hitler.
I think Jews are more sensitive about it, because "Jews control the world" as specified in the forged Protocols has long been used as a reason to attack and persecute them.
If someone said that Buddhists control the world, I'd call him a crazy. If someone said that about white men, I'd think he's a crazy bigot.
I'm not going to continue on the other threads because they're so far off topic. I do find your agreement with the JQ-types to be surprising though.
OK. But this applies equally to every group other than whites, men, heterosexuals - their betes noirs. You can't even bitch about Asians, and they get screwed over bigly by the wokies.
It's OK to criticize Israel if you're from the left. It's not OK to criticize Israel if you're from the right. It's as simple as that. It's hierarchy.
It's not really speculation. Any tightly knit community will look like that. E.g. Sowell describes how Jewish traders sometimes avoided contract and lawyer costs by trading without contracts, due to the trust that existed between them. Of course you're going to trade with a fellow Jew whom you (at least think you can) trust rather than with an outsider.
That wealth has to exist in the first place though. It didn't come dropping out of the sky. Same with the wealth of the overseas Chinese. They are the ones who created that wealth.
I think it's a diversion.
Not really. Left-wingers who go after Israel face cancellation as well. For example: https://www.thefire.org/new-york-senate-reintroduces-bill-to-deny-student-organizations-funding-over-hate-speech-and-pro-bds-advocacy/
Just search FIRE's website, and you can find more.
If they consider us outsiders, maybe we should start returning favor eh?
How so? The discussion on Jews just falls under the umbrella of what it means for white countries to become multi-ethnic and/or multicultural, just as discussions on black crime, for example, do.
Whites have a right to discuss our future. White Americans and many Europeans face a precarious demographic situation. We need to be discussing how this happened to us, what challenges we will face going forward, and what we are going to do to survive through it. These are the most important questions for white people in every country facing the demographic cliff.
This discussion is going to happen whether "anti-idpol" people (who nearly, down to every last man, are Zionists who support Jewish idpol despite their fraudulent self-disgnation) want it to or not. Maybe not here, maybe not now, but the question, "what is to become of white Americans (or British, etc.)?" will be answered, and it will be white people answering it, even if our numbers dwindled quite badly before enough of our own get off the bench and into the game.
You can get on board or get the fuck out of the way.
Consider? Not particularly impressive influence in a Jew-heavy state like New York.
See, you won't, because that won't work. Not until whites are a tightly knit community, as they are in South Africa. I'm 10,000% sure that whites in South Africa would rather trade with each other than with other groups.
I'm anti-IDPol, and yes, I'm a Zionist (believe that Israel has a right to exist). I support Israel's right to keep outsiders out, and I support my own country keeping outsiders out, and yours if it so desires.
On board with what?
Like I said, search FIRE's site, and you can find plenty of examples.
These go hand in hand. You can't be a tightly knit community without seeing outsiders as what they are.
You guys always pull this shit. Finish the sentence. it should be, "I support Israel's right to exist as a country that maintains an ethnically Jewish majority complete with DNA testing for immigration." In other words, you support defining a country by idpol while calling yourself anit-idpol.
white identity politics
The one you cited wasn't particularly good.
How come the outsiders are always the bad guys?
Yes? Sounds reasonable to me. If France decides to let in people, why not Huguenots who moved to South Africa?
That's just called a 'country'. In what other way can you define a national state?
What's the likelihood that someone who is not white will get on board with 'white identity politics'? And for that matter, why would I need to 'get out of the way'?
I'm just going to roll my eyes here. I'm not religious, and the quote isn't exact, but I'll just say, "by its fruits shall you know it."
Yes, technically people would probably look at you funny if you started ranting about a global cabal of gays or Buddhists that were running the world for their benefit, but they probably wouldn't just assume that you're Hitler.
I'm not going to continue on the other threads because they're so far off topic. I do find your agreement with the JQ-types to be surprising though.
I think Jews are more sensitive about it, because "Jews control the world" as specified in the forged Protocols has long been used as a reason to attack and persecute them.
If someone said that Buddhists control the world, I'd call him a crazy. If someone said that about white men, I'd think he's a crazy bigot.
What specific agreement?