Consider? Not particularly impressive influence in a Jew-heavy state like New York.
If they consider us outsiders, maybe we should start returning favor eh?
See, you won't, because that won't work. Not until whites are a tightly knit community, as they are in South Africa. I'm 10,000% sure that whites in South Africa would rather trade with each other than with other groups.
This discussion is going to happen whether "anti-idpol" people (who nearly, down to every last man, are Zionists who support Jewish idpol despite their fraudulent self-disgnation)
I'm anti-IDPol, and yes, I'm a Zionist (believe that Israel has a right to exist). I support Israel's right to keep outsiders out, and I support my own country keeping outsiders out, and yours if it so desires.
You can get on board or get the fuck out of the way.
Consider? Not particularly impressive influence in a Jew-heavy state like New York.
Like I said, search FIRE's site, and you can find plenty of examples.
See, you won't, because that won't work. Not until whites are a tightly knit community
These go hand in hand. You can't be a tightly knit community without seeing outsiders as what they are.
I'm anti-IDPol, and yes, I'm a Zionist (believe that Israel has a right to exist).
You guys always pull this shit. Finish the sentence. it should be, "I support Israel's right to exist as a country that maintains an ethnically Jewish majority complete with DNA testing for immigration." In other words, you support defining a country by idpol while calling yourself anit-idpol.
Like I said, search FIRE's site, and you can find plenty of examples.
The one you cited wasn't particularly good.
These go hand in hand. You can't be a tightly knit community without seeing outsiders as what they are.
How come the outsiders are always the bad guys?
You guys always pull this shit. Finish the sentence. it should be, "I support Israel's right to exist as a country that maintains an ethnically Jewish majority complete with DNA testing for immigration."
Yes? Sounds reasonable to me. If France decides to let in people, why not Huguenots who moved to South Africa?
In other words, you support defining a country by idpol while calling yourself anit-idpol.
That's just called a 'country'. In what other way can you define a national state?
white identity politics
What's the likelihood that someone who is not white will get on board with 'white identity politics'? And for that matter, why would I need to 'get out of the way'?
See also the censuring of Omar for the "all about the Benjamin's" incident.
How come the outsiders are always the bad guys?
Look back at the discussion. All I said is that I agree with you that they consider us outsiders so we should do the same. Are you saying we should treat people as insiders when they don't reciprocate that? That's what white people have been doing, as I've said in one of my other comments, and it's been a miserable failure.
What's the likelihood that someone who is not white will get on board with 'white identity politics'?
You're not a Jew, and you're on board with Jewish identity politics so what's the big deal?
And for that matter, why would I need to 'get out of the way'?
The worse the anti-white stuff gets, the worse the backlash is going to be. Oddly enough, there are Jews who are aware of this and join things like AmRen.
What of it? If a government spends money, is it not entitled to demand that you not boycott friendly states?
See also the censuring of Omar for the "all about the Benjamin's" incident.
You mean that which they turned into a condemnation of 'white supremacy' and Islamophobia instead? That alone should prove to you who is in charge, and it's not the Jews.
All I said is that I agree with you that they consider us outsiders so we should do the same. Are you saying we should treat people as insiders when they don't reciprocate that?
But it doesn't work. You need a strong, homogeneous culture for that. Whites are not that.
You're not a Jew, and you're on board with Jewish identity politics so what's the big deal?
I'm not. I just say that Israel has a right to exist and keep out immigrants it doesn't want. Just like we in Europe do. Germany gave citizenship to people fleeing the Volga/Balts but only if they were Germans. Is that IDPol as well? No, it's just being a country.
The worse the anti-white stuff gets, the worse the backlash is going to be. Oddly enough, there are Jews who are aware of this and join things like AmRen.
You don't see me supporting the anti-white stuff. But IDPol is not the answer.
Consider? Not particularly impressive influence in a Jew-heavy state like New York.
See, you won't, because that won't work. Not until whites are a tightly knit community, as they are in South Africa. I'm 10,000% sure that whites in South Africa would rather trade with each other than with other groups.
I'm anti-IDPol, and yes, I'm a Zionist (believe that Israel has a right to exist). I support Israel's right to keep outsiders out, and I support my own country keeping outsiders out, and yours if it so desires.
On board with what?
Like I said, search FIRE's site, and you can find plenty of examples.
These go hand in hand. You can't be a tightly knit community without seeing outsiders as what they are.
You guys always pull this shit. Finish the sentence. it should be, "I support Israel's right to exist as a country that maintains an ethnically Jewish majority complete with DNA testing for immigration." In other words, you support defining a country by idpol while calling yourself anit-idpol.
white identity politics
The one you cited wasn't particularly good.
How come the outsiders are always the bad guys?
Yes? Sounds reasonable to me. If France decides to let in people, why not Huguenots who moved to South Africa?
That's just called a 'country'. In what other way can you define a national state?
What's the likelihood that someone who is not white will get on board with 'white identity politics'? And for that matter, why would I need to 'get out of the way'?
Here's another one for you.
https://www.thefire.org/minnesota-bill-targeting-boycotts-of-israel-risks-chilling-campus-speech/
See also the censuring of Omar for the "all about the Benjamin's" incident.
Look back at the discussion. All I said is that I agree with you that they consider us outsiders so we should do the same. Are you saying we should treat people as insiders when they don't reciprocate that? That's what white people have been doing, as I've said in one of my other comments, and it's been a miserable failure.
You're not a Jew, and you're on board with Jewish identity politics so what's the big deal?
The worse the anti-white stuff gets, the worse the backlash is going to be. Oddly enough, there are Jews who are aware of this and join things like AmRen.
What of it? If a government spends money, is it not entitled to demand that you not boycott friendly states?
You mean that which they turned into a condemnation of 'white supremacy' and Islamophobia instead? That alone should prove to you who is in charge, and it's not the Jews.
But it doesn't work. You need a strong, homogeneous culture for that. Whites are not that.
I'm not. I just say that Israel has a right to exist and keep out immigrants it doesn't want. Just like we in Europe do. Germany gave citizenship to people fleeing the Volga/Balts but only if they were Germans. Is that IDPol as well? No, it's just being a country.
You don't see me supporting the anti-white stuff. But IDPol is not the answer.