See also the censuring of Omar for the "all about the Benjamin's" incident.
How come the outsiders are always the bad guys?
Look back at the discussion. All I said is that I agree with you that they consider us outsiders so we should do the same. Are you saying we should treat people as insiders when they don't reciprocate that? That's what white people have been doing, as I've said in one of my other comments, and it's been a miserable failure.
What's the likelihood that someone who is not white will get on board with 'white identity politics'?
You're not a Jew, and you're on board with Jewish identity politics so what's the big deal?
And for that matter, why would I need to 'get out of the way'?
The worse the anti-white stuff gets, the worse the backlash is going to be. Oddly enough, there are Jews who are aware of this and join things like AmRen.
What of it? If a government spends money, is it not entitled to demand that you not boycott friendly states?
See also the censuring of Omar for the "all about the Benjamin's" incident.
You mean that which they turned into a condemnation of 'white supremacy' and Islamophobia instead? That alone should prove to you who is in charge, and it's not the Jews.
All I said is that I agree with you that they consider us outsiders so we should do the same. Are you saying we should treat people as insiders when they don't reciprocate that?
But it doesn't work. You need a strong, homogeneous culture for that. Whites are not that.
You're not a Jew, and you're on board with Jewish identity politics so what's the big deal?
I'm not. I just say that Israel has a right to exist and keep out immigrants it doesn't want. Just like we in Europe do. Germany gave citizenship to people fleeing the Volga/Balts but only if they were Germans. Is that IDPol as well? No, it's just being a country.
The worse the anti-white stuff gets, the worse the backlash is going to be. Oddly enough, there are Jews who are aware of this and join things like AmRen.
You don't see me supporting the anti-white stuff. But IDPol is not the answer.
You're moving the goal posts. You said lefties wouldn't get in trouble for going after Israel. Now you are justifying going after them.
It's not 'criticism'. That was what it was about. So they're not suppressing criticism. They're trying to suppress attempts to destroy a friendly state. And I underline TRYING. And who is doing that? Not "the Jews" - many Jews are fanatically anti-Israel.
They most definitely worked the anti-Semitism angle.
The resolution passed by the House didn't though, instead stressing their hobby horses, which is why some GOP voted against it.
Not with that attitude! Are you saying Jews are homogeneous? Interesting...
I think that those who favor the in group do. I don't think Orthodox Jews favor atheist or Reform Jews, I think they favor other Orthodox. The assimilated probably favor people of their own politics rather than other Jews, particularly if those Jews are of the wrongthink variety.
Why not? You're fine with it being the answer for Jews. Why not us?
It's not fine for everyone. You just call it IDPol. If I were you, I would advocate for the same thing that Israel does, and simply not call it IDPol.
Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
That's basically tailor-made to blunt left-wing critics of Israel since they love the r-word.
The resolution passed by the House didn't though, instead stressing their hobby horses, which is why some GOP voted against it.
I could have sworn that condemned all hate or some other generic nonsense. Regardless, Omar complained about the Israel lobbied and got slapped down. I'm not shocked the condemnation turned a bit generic eventually because that's how they keep the anti-white coalition alive.
I think that those who favor the in group do. I don't think Orthodox Jews favor atheist or Reform Jews, I think they favor other Orthodox.
Yet these groups are all present in their ethnostate. I'm still confused as to what point you are trying to make. Are you saying white people shouldn't try to build a culture for ourselves?
It's not fine for everyone.
I repeat, why not?
If I were you, I would advocate for the same thing that Israel does, and simply not call it IDPol.
Here's another one for you.
https://www.thefire.org/minnesota-bill-targeting-boycotts-of-israel-risks-chilling-campus-speech/
See also the censuring of Omar for the "all about the Benjamin's" incident.
Look back at the discussion. All I said is that I agree with you that they consider us outsiders so we should do the same. Are you saying we should treat people as insiders when they don't reciprocate that? That's what white people have been doing, as I've said in one of my other comments, and it's been a miserable failure.
You're not a Jew, and you're on board with Jewish identity politics so what's the big deal?
The worse the anti-white stuff gets, the worse the backlash is going to be. Oddly enough, there are Jews who are aware of this and join things like AmRen.
What of it? If a government spends money, is it not entitled to demand that you not boycott friendly states?
You mean that which they turned into a condemnation of 'white supremacy' and Islamophobia instead? That alone should prove to you who is in charge, and it's not the Jews.
But it doesn't work. You need a strong, homogeneous culture for that. Whites are not that.
I'm not. I just say that Israel has a right to exist and keep out immigrants it doesn't want. Just like we in Europe do. Germany gave citizenship to people fleeing the Volga/Balts but only if they were Germans. Is that IDPol as well? No, it's just being a country.
You don't see me supporting the anti-white stuff. But IDPol is not the answer.
You're moving the goal posts. You said lefties wouldn't get in trouble for going after Israel. Now you are justifying going after them.
They most definitely worked the anti-Semitism angle.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democratic-lawmakers-slam-rep-omar-over-deeply-hurtful-and-offensive-israel-comments
Not with that attitude! Are you saying Jews are homogeneous? Interesting...
Why not? You're fine with it being the answer for Jews. Why not us?
It's not 'criticism'. That was what it was about. So they're not suppressing criticism. They're trying to suppress attempts to destroy a friendly state. And I underline TRYING. And who is doing that? Not "the Jews" - many Jews are fanatically anti-Israel.
The resolution passed by the House didn't though, instead stressing their hobby horses, which is why some GOP voted against it.
I think that those who favor the in group do. I don't think Orthodox Jews favor atheist or Reform Jews, I think they favor other Orthodox. The assimilated probably favor people of their own politics rather than other Jews, particularly if those Jews are of the wrongthink variety.
It's not fine for everyone. You just call it IDPol. If I were you, I would advocate for the same thing that Israel does, and simply not call it IDPol.
Israel is friendly to the state of Minnesota? Anyway, here is another for you.
https://www.thefire.org/fire-to-nyu-uphold-your-free-speech-promises-and-stop-investigating-anti-zionist-statement/
See also, the State Department's definition of anti-semitism, which includes:
That's basically tailor-made to blunt left-wing critics of Israel since they love the r-word.
I could have sworn that condemned all hate or some other generic nonsense. Regardless, Omar complained about the Israel lobbied and got slapped down. I'm not shocked the condemnation turned a bit generic eventually because that's how they keep the anti-white coalition alive.
Yet these groups are all present in their ethnostate. I'm still confused as to what point you are trying to make. Are you saying white people shouldn't try to build a culture for ourselves?
I repeat, why not?
I should lie then?