You're moving the goal posts. You said lefties wouldn't get in trouble for going after Israel. Now you are justifying going after them.
It's not 'criticism'. That was what it was about. So they're not suppressing criticism. They're trying to suppress attempts to destroy a friendly state. And I underline TRYING. And who is doing that? Not "the Jews" - many Jews are fanatically anti-Israel.
They most definitely worked the anti-Semitism angle.
The resolution passed by the House didn't though, instead stressing their hobby horses, which is why some GOP voted against it.
Not with that attitude! Are you saying Jews are homogeneous? Interesting...
I think that those who favor the in group do. I don't think Orthodox Jews favor atheist or Reform Jews, I think they favor other Orthodox. The assimilated probably favor people of their own politics rather than other Jews, particularly if those Jews are of the wrongthink variety.
Why not? You're fine with it being the answer for Jews. Why not us?
It's not fine for everyone. You just call it IDPol. If I were you, I would advocate for the same thing that Israel does, and simply not call it IDPol.
Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
That's basically tailor-made to blunt left-wing critics of Israel since they love the r-word.
The resolution passed by the House didn't though, instead stressing their hobby horses, which is why some GOP voted against it.
I could have sworn that condemned all hate or some other generic nonsense. Regardless, Omar complained about the Israel lobbied and got slapped down. I'm not shocked the condemnation turned a bit generic eventually because that's how they keep the anti-white coalition alive.
I think that those who favor the in group do. I don't think Orthodox Jews favor atheist or Reform Jews, I think they favor other Orthodox.
Yet these groups are all present in their ethnostate. I'm still confused as to what point you are trying to make. Are you saying white people shouldn't try to build a culture for ourselves?
It's not fine for everyone.
I repeat, why not?
If I were you, I would advocate for the same thing that Israel does, and simply not call it IDPol.
Israel is friendly to the state of Minnesota? Anyway, here is another for you.
MN does not have foreign relations. The US as a whole does.
people living under occupation have a right to resist their violent occupation
This? You can argue the minutiae, but this would not be defended if anything else was targeted by it.
That's basically tailor-made to blunt left-wing critics of Israel since they love the r-word.
I've seen a lot of Stormfags try to cynically use that argument. Same for 'ethnostate'.
I could have sworn that condemned all hate or some other generic nonsense.
Exactly. So they responded to someone being accused of AS by condemning their own litany of hobby horses, including 'white supremacy' and 'Islamophobia'.
Regardless, Omar complained about the Israel lobbied and got slapped down.
Barely. She voted for the resolution, and some GOP Jews voted against it. That alone should tell you where things stood.
Yet these groups are all present in their ethnostate. I'm still confused as to what point you are trying to make. Are you saying white people shouldn't try to build a culture for ourselves?
Why would they? It makes little sense to me to make a culture based on a color, or a race, or what have you.
I repeat, why not?
Correction: it's not fine for ANYONE. That's what I meant. IDPol is cancer. Politics should not revolve around trying to benefit people based on their race.
I've seen a lot of Stormfags try to cynically use that argument. Same for 'ethnostate'.
It is an ethnostate. Fuckers actually used DNA testing.
Barely
Close only counts in horseshoes.
She voted for the resolution, and some GOP Jews voted against it. That alone should tell you where things stood.
Where it stands is that someone criticized the Israel lobby and was thoroughly cucked that she practically voted to condemn herself, really not helping your case. Republicans Jews voting against doesn't mean what you think. They just like to center Jewish victimhood to a greater extent than the Dems did since the Dems, as I said, preferred pandering to a coalition of anti-whites. Besides, this resolution is just virtue signaling anyway. If you look at things that matter materially, consider the Iron Dome funding, for example. That passed the house 420-9.
It makes little sense to me to make a culture based on a color, or a race, or what have you.
But it makes perfect sense to base one off of Jewish ancestry, right?
Correction: it's not fine for ANYONE. That's what I meant. IDPol is cancer. Politics should not revolve around trying to benefit people based on their race.
You can't believe this and be pro-Israel. You're going to have to pick one.
You're moving the goal posts. You said lefties wouldn't get in trouble for going after Israel. Now you are justifying going after them.
They most definitely worked the anti-Semitism angle.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democratic-lawmakers-slam-rep-omar-over-deeply-hurtful-and-offensive-israel-comments
Not with that attitude! Are you saying Jews are homogeneous? Interesting...
Why not? You're fine with it being the answer for Jews. Why not us?
It's not 'criticism'. That was what it was about. So they're not suppressing criticism. They're trying to suppress attempts to destroy a friendly state. And I underline TRYING. And who is doing that? Not "the Jews" - many Jews are fanatically anti-Israel.
The resolution passed by the House didn't though, instead stressing their hobby horses, which is why some GOP voted against it.
I think that those who favor the in group do. I don't think Orthodox Jews favor atheist or Reform Jews, I think they favor other Orthodox. The assimilated probably favor people of their own politics rather than other Jews, particularly if those Jews are of the wrongthink variety.
It's not fine for everyone. You just call it IDPol. If I were you, I would advocate for the same thing that Israel does, and simply not call it IDPol.
Israel is friendly to the state of Minnesota? Anyway, here is another for you.
https://www.thefire.org/fire-to-nyu-uphold-your-free-speech-promises-and-stop-investigating-anti-zionist-statement/
See also, the State Department's definition of anti-semitism, which includes:
That's basically tailor-made to blunt left-wing critics of Israel since they love the r-word.
I could have sworn that condemned all hate or some other generic nonsense. Regardless, Omar complained about the Israel lobbied and got slapped down. I'm not shocked the condemnation turned a bit generic eventually because that's how they keep the anti-white coalition alive.
Yet these groups are all present in their ethnostate. I'm still confused as to what point you are trying to make. Are you saying white people shouldn't try to build a culture for ourselves?
I repeat, why not?
I should lie then?
MN does not have foreign relations. The US as a whole does.
people living under occupation have a right to resist their violent occupation
This? You can argue the minutiae, but this would not be defended if anything else was targeted by it.
I've seen a lot of Stormfags try to cynically use that argument. Same for 'ethnostate'.
Exactly. So they responded to someone being accused of AS by condemning their own litany of hobby horses, including 'white supremacy' and 'Islamophobia'.
Barely. She voted for the resolution, and some GOP Jews voted against it. That alone should tell you where things stood.
Why would they? It makes little sense to me to make a culture based on a color, or a race, or what have you.
Correction: it's not fine for ANYONE. That's what I meant. IDPol is cancer. Politics should not revolve around trying to benefit people based on their race.
It's the truth though.
It is an ethnostate. Fuckers actually used DNA testing.
Close only counts in horseshoes.
Where it stands is that someone criticized the Israel lobby and was thoroughly cucked that she practically voted to condemn herself, really not helping your case. Republicans Jews voting against doesn't mean what you think. They just like to center Jewish victimhood to a greater extent than the Dems did since the Dems, as I said, preferred pandering to a coalition of anti-whites. Besides, this resolution is just virtue signaling anyway. If you look at things that matter materially, consider the Iron Dome funding, for example. That passed the house 420-9.
But it makes perfect sense to base one off of Jewish ancestry, right?
You can't believe this and be pro-Israel. You're going to have to pick one.