As I write this, the top of r-all on Reddit is a post from WhitePeopleTwitter titled "This is American Christianity". The content is a tweet from "RabbiHarvey":
20 Republican Christian AG’s just wrote a proposal to deny free school lunches to LGBTQIA students. In other words, they don’t think particular humans deserve food. They think they should starve. This is American Christianity. https://twitter.com/rabbiharvey/status/1555587418866196480
He then links to this article in support of his claim: https://www.fatherly.com/news/20-republican-ags-sue-the-usda-over-nondiscrimination-clause This is a far left wing activist site: "Commie pinko bs owned by 2 gay jews" The author is also untrustworthy:
Devan McGuinness (she/they) is a Canadian disabled writer, editor, and social strategist... Devan’s bylines have appeared in Healthline, Parents.com, Scary Mommy, Mom.com, and more
So it appears that communist libs have been trying to play a little game of cloaking their propaganda in the guise of family-oriented site names. Just like how Biden's new BBB spending spree on green bullshit is called the "inflation reduction act". They fundamentally think people are stupid and easily tricked.
So let's talk about the truth of what really happened:
-
On May 5, the USDA's Food and Nutrition Service announced its intention to interpret "the prohibition on discrimination based on sex found in Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972" to include "discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity."
-
The department cited the U.S. Supreme Court's 2020 decision in Bostock v. Clayton County finding that the provision of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibiting discrimination based on sex also applies to sexual orientation and gender identity as the justification for the new interpretation of Title IX.
-
As a result of the USDA's interpretation of Title IX, "state and local agencies, program operators and sponsors that receive funds from FNS must investigate allegations of discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation" and "update their non-discrimination policies and signage to include prohibitions against discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation."
-
The FNS administers the National School Lunch Program, which provides low-cost and free lunches to 29.6 million children at nearly 100,000 public and nonprofit private schools in the fiscal year 2019. The USDA would cut off Red states from federal funding for the National School Lunch Program and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance (SNAP) Program unless they agreed to operate as an LGBT gestapo and enforcers.
-
Tennessee's Republican Attorney General Herbert Slatery joined 21 other Republican attorneys general in filing a lawsuit against the USDA This lawsuit seeks the following relief:
Overturning the USDA's new rule. & Barring the USDA from punishing states who "continue to separate students by biological sex in appropriate circumstances" or "maintain showers, locker rooms, bathrooms, residential facilities, and other living facilities separated by biological sex or regulate each individual’s access to those facilities based on the individual’s biological sex." or "do not require employees or students to use a transgender individual’s preferred pronouns." or "maintain athletic teams separated by biological sex or from assigning an individual to a team based on the individual’s biological sex"
Nowhere in the lawsuit does it propose "to deny free school lunches to LGBTQIA students". This is a lie and it's at the top of Reddit with 44k upvotes and rapidly rising. The comments are all disgusting anti-Christian invective, and a large number of deleted comments with no mention that the tweet is a lie, means that the mods were mass-deleting any comments pointing out the truth, and then locked the thread so that no one could ever get the truth out.
This is evil. This is an existential threat to Christians. These people are evil, and they want to destroy all that is righteous and good in order to push mental illness and degeneracy so that they can pave the way to communist authoritarianism.
We've already covered this. You want to be liberated from the society you inhabit. You wants its social norms and traditions destroyed because you view them as oppressive. It's the same impetus as feminism, but each of you blame the opposite gender so you end up at odds.
Liberalism also has a long history of being female exclusionary. That was the dominant position of liberalism up into the 20th century when women's suffrage became a new liberal norm.
I view them as unnecessary, not oppressive.
Marriage is a relic from when women were a burden nobody wanted. They still are unwanted, but at least they can pay their own way if nobody wants the dead weight on their back.
Actually, that's a bit too shitpost-y.
Let's go into it.
Children used to be a benefit as they could work the land you own. They no longer are, because most people are not farmers.
Having a wife used to be necessary when appliances didn't exist and everything had to be done by hand. Now I can just throw a Roomba down and put my clothes in the washing machine, and despite the cost of electricity, still save a ton of money over having that extra dependent.
Bullshit. No one shrieks like a wounded retard at something the way that you do about marriage just because they view it as unnecessary. You;re not fooling anyone with this bullshitting of yours.
Viewing children entirely through the lens of how you can exploit them for your individual profit isn't helping dispel the idea that you are a liberal.
Also, you didn't say anything about liberalism existing without adopting female suffrage. I guess if Peggy McIntosh invented racism in 1987, we can have liberalism invented in the late 19th or early 20th century. Who gives a shit about reality anyway?
Well, a better statement would be detrimental. It's destroyed millions of men for nothing but "tradition".
But the people whining about the kids I don't have are comparing me to people from that era, where kids equalled profit.