As I write this, the top of r-all on Reddit is a post from WhitePeopleTwitter titled "This is American Christianity". The content is a tweet from "RabbiHarvey":
20 Republican Christian AG’s just wrote a proposal to deny free school lunches to LGBTQIA students. In other words, they don’t think particular humans deserve food. They think they should starve. This is American Christianity. https://twitter.com/rabbiharvey/status/1555587418866196480
He then links to this article in support of his claim: https://www.fatherly.com/news/20-republican-ags-sue-the-usda-over-nondiscrimination-clause This is a far left wing activist site: "Commie pinko bs owned by 2 gay jews" The author is also untrustworthy:
Devan McGuinness (she/they) is a Canadian disabled writer, editor, and social strategist... Devan’s bylines have appeared in Healthline, Parents.com, Scary Mommy, Mom.com, and more
So it appears that communist libs have been trying to play a little game of cloaking their propaganda in the guise of family-oriented site names. Just like how Biden's new BBB spending spree on green bullshit is called the "inflation reduction act". They fundamentally think people are stupid and easily tricked.
So let's talk about the truth of what really happened:
-
On May 5, the USDA's Food and Nutrition Service announced its intention to interpret "the prohibition on discrimination based on sex found in Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972" to include "discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity."
-
The department cited the U.S. Supreme Court's 2020 decision in Bostock v. Clayton County finding that the provision of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibiting discrimination based on sex also applies to sexual orientation and gender identity as the justification for the new interpretation of Title IX.
-
As a result of the USDA's interpretation of Title IX, "state and local agencies, program operators and sponsors that receive funds from FNS must investigate allegations of discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation" and "update their non-discrimination policies and signage to include prohibitions against discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation."
-
The FNS administers the National School Lunch Program, which provides low-cost and free lunches to 29.6 million children at nearly 100,000 public and nonprofit private schools in the fiscal year 2019. The USDA would cut off Red states from federal funding for the National School Lunch Program and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance (SNAP) Program unless they agreed to operate as an LGBT gestapo and enforcers.
-
Tennessee's Republican Attorney General Herbert Slatery joined 21 other Republican attorneys general in filing a lawsuit against the USDA This lawsuit seeks the following relief:
Overturning the USDA's new rule. & Barring the USDA from punishing states who "continue to separate students by biological sex in appropriate circumstances" or "maintain showers, locker rooms, bathrooms, residential facilities, and other living facilities separated by biological sex or regulate each individual’s access to those facilities based on the individual’s biological sex." or "do not require employees or students to use a transgender individual’s preferred pronouns." or "maintain athletic teams separated by biological sex or from assigning an individual to a team based on the individual’s biological sex"
Nowhere in the lawsuit does it propose "to deny free school lunches to LGBTQIA students". This is a lie and it's at the top of Reddit with 44k upvotes and rapidly rising. The comments are all disgusting anti-Christian invective, and a large number of deleted comments with no mention that the tweet is a lie, means that the mods were mass-deleting any comments pointing out the truth, and then locked the thread so that no one could ever get the truth out.
This is evil. This is an existential threat to Christians. These people are evil, and they want to destroy all that is righteous and good in order to push mental illness and degeneracy so that they can pave the way to communist authoritarianism.
How can you support porn when it involves the mass transfer of male wealth to women who do nothing more then show tits and spread legs?
He hates everything with women.
Hates whores, but if you say we should ban porn/prostitution, he screams.
He always talks about having kids being a cuck horrible thing, but he is also against women having the right to abort.
All the weird crap with him is just all over the place, man.
He is probably a porn addict.
Unfortunately the mentally ill often scream the loudest, just look at twitter.
Because if you ban it, women will exploit those men's desires faster than you can say "Impossible was right again." You know that, you're just pretending you don't to try and score Internet points...and it's just embarrassing for both of us.
I oppose everything women support, because 9/10 times, that's the right thing to do.
You assume I understand the weird stuff going on with you.
Yes, I really do care about internet points. Sure. Will you call me a Pick Me, like a feminist would?
Women support and are against everything. A bunch of women are against abortion, a bunch for it. So then what spiteful opinion you hold?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mkG8efsUHo
One of my favourite anime ever.
I don't believe for two seconds that you don't have some level of basic understanding of how sexual urges are exploited to push marriage for the woman's gain.
Fortunately, the need to say that will never arise.
Hell, strike the 'again' and it's still never gonna happen.
"I believe the Ukrainian war was caused by toxic masculinity" - Boris Johnson, Prime Minister of the United
FemdomKingdom.When I'm wrong I retract, as I did against DeSantis.
IIRC this is the first time you've acknowledged that porn only makes a small set of women rich.
It's common sense. The problem came when women decided they didn't want to play fair and started exploiting people as much as humanly possible with parasocial relationships.
What does common sense have to do with you?
Yes I'm referring to Onlyfans. It's total exploitation of men. At least with the porn industry, there were men running the porn companies exploiting the women. With OF, the women are doing the exploitation directly.
OF was created by men, and it's majority owner is Leonid Radvinsky, a male. The original creators started a number of failed porn ventures before hitting it with OF. Radvinsky was an already established pornographer who bought out most of the shares.
It's almost like the "exploitative" men were the only people holding back the true exploitation.
You want to hear a funny story?
There was a guy who claimed that teachers abuse kids in order to line the pockets of OnlyFans thots.
That guy was you.