Anyway, my "subtlety" as you put it, is to avoid the massive quantity of stormcuck reports.
Your irony meter is broken. Obviously, I don't think you're subtle at all, when every comment of yours is about how much you hate women. But hey, at least it is not 'misogyny' because it's justified (you say) due to their massive rates of rape and murder.
Are you denying that women who fell in love with a star because she abused a man are bad people?
Rather, I made fun of you for claiming that women in general are 'bad people'. Besides, you said that Sarah Everhard deserved to be murdered for no reason at all, so...
The fact that they say this will be catered to women, with a woman directing it, says a lot.
That you're gullible and will fall for literally anything? Obviously, this is not a real offer. And obviously, no woman is going to watch this.
If not, go right ahead and make one of your patented predictions.
They must know that women would absolutely be into watching this abuser who should be in jail.
Same shit happened with Cardi B, admitting she robbed men gave her a first UK number one.
This thing happened after this other thing. OBVIOUSLY, THEY ARE RELATED!
Fictional characters invented by bad people don't count.
If you thought that, then you wouldn't have said that she 'deserved to die'. Quite a pathetic attempt to save face. I guess even you realized you messed up when you said that.
Because it won't exist (Just like Sarah Everard).
Have you ever thought of sending all these great discoveries of yours to the defense attorney of the police officer?
Or is he bribed and blackmailed by Kim Potter as well?
Otherwise they probably would.
LOL! Yes, women, well-known to love porn.
Let's not forget, Amber Heard's entire recent career has been based off women who like her for being an abuser. L'Oréal never dropped her.
I didn't say that though. What I said is that if it was real, I really wouldn't care, because women have been attacking men in the street for months prior and the only reason "Sarah" was being reported on was to further justify their violence.
I'm not sure if you understand UK court. You could have a picture of the guy at the fucking Canary Islands that night, and he'd still be found guilty. The legal system there exists to enforce women's will and nothing else. It's funny that we're having this discussion on a conversation about Amber Heard, because the UK was the only place in the world that considered her accusations credible.
Well it wasn't men who bought 50 shades of gold digging slut.
It's not mind reading, it's glaringly obvious. Women always rally behind other women who harm men, without fail. These people always enjoy a boost in support after being outed.
What I said is that if it was real, I really wouldn't care, because women have been attacking men in the street for months prior
Mad as a March hare. By that standard, I won't care about men murdered by women, because men have been raping and murdering women for centuries. I guess our little Marc Lepine doesn't find that terribly persuasive.
You could have a picture of the guy at the fucking Canary Islands that night, and he'd still be found guilty
Right, like the guy who was acquitted for slitting his wife's throat. Anyway, so the defense is making all sorts of other arguments, but not this great argument that you brilliantly discovered, because? They're bribed not to embarrass the court?
Well it wasn't men who bought 50 shades of gold digging slut.
Because it wasn't graphic, visual porn, dummy.
Women always rally behind other women who harm men, without fail.
Like you are behind the man who murdered Sarah Everhard, the troon sex offender who exposed himself to children, and that Manchester United alleged rapist.
By the way, why should women care after you've spent centuries murdering and raping them? You have forfeited any right to whine about Amber Heard with what you said about Sarah Everhard, you little psycho.
These people always enjoy a boost in support after being outed.
Your irony meter is broken. Obviously, I don't think you're subtle at all, when every comment of yours is about how much you hate women. But hey, at least it is not 'misogyny' because it's justified (you say) due to their massive rates of rape and murder.
Rather, I made fun of you for claiming that women in general are 'bad people'. Besides, you said that Sarah Everhard deserved to be murdered for no reason at all, so...
That you're gullible and will fall for literally anything? Obviously, this is not a real offer. And obviously, no woman is going to watch this.
If not, go right ahead and make one of your patented predictions.
This thing happened after this other thing. OBVIOUSLY, THEY ARE RELATED!
Fictional characters invented by bad people don't count.
Because it won't exist (Just like Sarah Everard). Otherwise they probably would.
Let's not forget, Amber Heard's entire recent career has been based off women who like her for being an abuser. L'Oréal never dropped her.
If you thought that, then you wouldn't have said that she 'deserved to die'. Quite a pathetic attempt to save face. I guess even you realized you messed up when you said that.
Have you ever thought of sending all these great discoveries of yours to the defense attorney of the police officer?
Or is he bribed and blackmailed by Kim Potter as well?
LOL! Yes, women, well-known to love porn.
More mind-reading.
I didn't say that though. What I said is that if it was real, I really wouldn't care, because women have been attacking men in the street for months prior and the only reason "Sarah" was being reported on was to further justify their violence.
I'm not sure if you understand UK court. You could have a picture of the guy at the fucking Canary Islands that night, and he'd still be found guilty. The legal system there exists to enforce women's will and nothing else. It's funny that we're having this discussion on a conversation about Amber Heard, because the UK was the only place in the world that considered her accusations credible.
Well it wasn't men who bought 50 shades of gold digging slut.
It's not mind reading, it's glaringly obvious. Women always rally behind other women who harm men, without fail. These people always enjoy a boost in support after being outed.
Mad as a March hare. By that standard, I won't care about men murdered by women, because men have been raping and murdering women for centuries. I guess our little Marc Lepine doesn't find that terribly persuasive.
Right, like the guy who was acquitted for slitting his wife's throat. Anyway, so the defense is making all sorts of other arguments, but not this great argument that you brilliantly discovered, because? They're bribed not to embarrass the court?
Because it wasn't graphic, visual porn, dummy.
Like you are behind the man who murdered Sarah Everhard, the troon sex offender who exposed himself to children, and that Manchester United alleged rapist.
By the way, why should women care after you've spent centuries murdering and raping them? You have forfeited any right to whine about Amber Heard with what you said about Sarah Everhard, you little psycho.
More of your delusions. Reality says otherwise.