27
Comments (12)
sorted by:
5
SoctaticMethod1 5 points ago +5 / -0

Unless this using the theory 'if you d them hard enough you can turn a feminist into a 50s housewife', throw them into the Thames and something worse than monkeypox

Hell in that water probably got the original plague

5
TheImpossible1 [S] 5 points ago +7 / -2

Boris Johnson's final fuck you to the people.

Only found this out recently after seeing the UK Future Fund filing. I'd love to know what about the future is improved by sex parties revolving around man hatred.

Other ridiculous investments :

£900k in a company that plans to revive the airship.

Avida Global, a producer of CBD oils, which were recently made legal in the UK.

https://www.british-business-bank.co.uk/ourpartners/coronavirus-business-interruption-loan-schemes/future-fund/future-fund-companies/

8
Steampunk_Moustache 8 points ago +8 / -0

£900k in a company that plans to revive the airship.

Reviving airships is not as ridiculous as it sounds, and 900k is peanuts. Yes, they are slow, but it when it comes to fuel they are virtually free.

Remember, the only reason they were abandoned is because of the Hindenburg 'accident', oh, sorry, it's called the Hindeburg 'disaster'. Because apparantly an air transport 'crash' in which more than half the 61 people on board survive is a 'disaster'.

1
Assassin47 1 point ago +1 / -0

Indeed. Future of logistics will be:

  • Hybrid airships (mid-range, slow deliveries to where planes can't go)
  • Drones (hub to home, airship to home)
  • Starship (coastal, express deliveries)

Trains, trucks, and ships will still dominate but the above 3 will be core methods permeating the network.

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Boris Johnson's final fuck you to the people.

No, that will be Jess Philips becoming Prime Minister.

2
TheImpossible1 [S] 2 points ago +4 / -2

Liz Truss is basically the same thing, just without the name recognition.

I do find it funny that the WEF/New World Order candidate is losing to the More Feminine Way candidate by 34 points.

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Liz Truss is basically the same thing, just without the name recognition.

I can always count on you to torture yourself to the maximum extent, with the minimal amount of cause.

3
TheImpossible1 [S] 3 points ago +5 / -2

Uhh...I take it you didn't see her declare her "war on misogyny".

She wants a register for all accused male domestic abusers, a full revamp of the police to cater to women's interests and for counter-terrorism to invest more into chasing incels.

The only difference between her and Phillips is that Phillips couldn't keep her mouth shut until she had power.

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Uhh...I take it you didn't see her declare her "war on misogyny".

She's a psycho, but claiming that she's the same as Jess Philips just makes you a moron. But that's how we know you.

The only difference between her and Phillips is that Phillips couldn't keep her mouth shut until she had power.

She doesn't have 'power' yet.

2
TheImpossible1 [S] 2 points ago +4 / -2

I mean, can you tell me a difference between them? They both support female supremacist ideology, they both clearly hate everything male, they both want to weaponize the government...

I don't see a 35 point shift in polls in less than 3 weeks unless she announces how much she hates the Jews like Corbyn did as Labour leader. The only way she isn't PM is if Boris Johnson somehow gets convinced to recind his resignation.

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean, can you tell me a difference between them? They both support female supremacist ideology, they both clearly hate everything male, they both want to weaponize the government...

I can't tell you, because you can only think in strawmen and hyperbole.

FEMALE SUPREMACIST IDEOLOGY!!!!

I don't see a 35 point shift in polls in less than 3 weeks unless she announces how much she hates the Jews like Corbyn did as Labour leader.

Did he though? He certainly had a fixation on Israel, but never said anything about 'Jews'.

1
LibertyPrimeWasRight 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't see a problem with reviving the airship, with the right business model. I know it's safer now, and I bet there's plenty of market for luxury airship cruises or something. I'd also not be surprised if they'd be much more cost-efficient for non-urgent deliveries than airplanes.

Now, whether and in what circumstances the government has any business investing in this is a separate question, but just from "900k in airships," I wouldn't say its absurd.

2
Kienan 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'd trade the US's new near trillion dollar spending bill for that in a heartbeat, though.

Eighty billion ($80,000,000,000) to the IRS to double their manpower, and I think like almost a billion of that is going to weapons and ammo for them.

$400 billion to climate change stuff, including billions to the auto companies to skew the market toward electric.