MGTOW was mentioned in a financial report by Match Group. We are winning.
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
Yeah I saw this. Apparently they think that they haven't done enough to rig the system in favor of women. The real problem is that only Chads and thots get any utility out of dating apps. Bottom 80% males are wasting their time. The 40% of their userbase that's getting scammed must be finally waking up. The real fun is yet to come. Watch the thots abandon the apps in droves when they run out of betas to con into taking them on foodie dates.
I dunno, maybe that's true now. Back in the late '90s up to about 2010, I used match.com and managed to find and have pretty good relationships with four women over a ten-year period, with one affair being one of the greatest of my life, though I eventually got dumped because she was mercenary like all women and "traded up." I learned that older, divorced women, while really good in bed and usually interesting to talk with after sex, are generally not willing to start from scratch with a man in a lower tax bracket.
I think I removed myself from the dating market at about the right time in 2017.
Match.com had an algorithm that was supposedly tailored to successful long-term relationships, so I wouldn't even put that in the same different category as the dating apps men complain about. But yeah maybe they changed.
All these sites have algorithms that prioritize keeping people on their app and making them money. If the algorithm really did lead to a long term match that's 2 people who aren't doing that. But maybe Match.com is different. LTR = betabux, so non-Chads may have a chance on that app. Not like that ends well, but that's why MGTOW is exploding.
I paid for one month of match premium, found my wife, and quit the site. I think it cost $20.
That was a decade ago though. Who knows what the game is these days.
You might as well complain about 'free entry' for women at bars. Why do you think that is? This is for the same reason. Unless you are going to use Grinder, you want a lot of women to be on your app, not?
I'm not complaining. I'm reporting what the article said and calling it retarded. It isn't shown in the OP but that's exactly what the article said. My point is that the apps' problems stem from the fact that their business model revolves around conning men into playing a rigged game. The model fails when men realize that they're wasting their time and walk away, and that's what's happening here even if they desperately wish it wasn't the case.
Sort of like a microcosm for the dating/marriage scene in general.