the vast majority of sheep bleating about global warming aren't alleging that the damage would come in the form of people literally dropping dead of heat stroke. Acting like that is an actual main pillar of their argument will be perceived, rightfully so, as you strawmanning.
You're being stupid
Yes, people DO in fact make that argument a lot. Just because you're ignorant of something doesn't mean it does not exist. I've argued with plenty of "omg the wet bulb is gonna get exceeded!" alarmists.
It isn't a straw man, and stop misusing the term. Straw manning is MISREPRESENTING your opponents argument. No one is misrepresenting anything here.
You are misrepresenting the argument, thats the whole point. Just because you've encountered some certified retards saying this, doesn't mean it's the common/mainstream argument. Acting like it is in order to act like you're debunking some core climate change narrative is indeed strawmanning. But I know your type never admits that they're wrong no matter what so this is effectively a waste of time.
You're being stupid
Yes, people DO in fact make that argument a lot. Just because you're ignorant of something doesn't mean it does not exist. I've argued with plenty of "omg the wet bulb is gonna get exceeded!" alarmists.
It isn't a straw man, and stop misusing the term. Straw manning is MISREPRESENTING your opponents argument. No one is misrepresenting anything here.
You are misrepresenting the argument, thats the whole point. Just because you've encountered some certified retards saying this, doesn't mean it's the common/mainstream argument. Acting like it is in order to act like you're debunking some core climate change narrative is indeed strawmanning. But I know your type never admits that they're wrong no matter what so this is effectively a waste of time.