Do you have a different explanation for why they are considered so harmful but not harmful enough to be on a watchlist?
I do, but I don't need a 'different explanation' to reject the preposterous ones. Besides, you'd just ignore it anyway, like when I told you that it wasn't going to happen that 90% of people (or even 9%) would die of the vaccine - that if there were massive deaths, the ruling class would end up before a firing squad.
You, on the other hand, insisted that people would drop dead like flies, but that they would obediently go get the next booster.
And then when called out, you blamed the discrepancy between the 90% you predicted would die and the rounding error from 0% that did die on... 15% not getting the vaccine.
TERFs are controlled opposition that ensure the trannies don't topple female privilege and if the tradcons topple the tranny cult, the part that targets males survives.
If they win in a coalition with tradcons, they'll have to behave themselves or be kicked to the curb.
Source:
https://archive.ph/1xzhL
Some of this stuff is extreme even by tranny propaganda standards
Well, you also said that the vaccine would kill 90% of people, so maybe we can be a bit more optimistic than you?
I do, but I don't need a 'different explanation' to reject the preposterous ones. Besides, you'd just ignore it anyway, like when I told you that it wasn't going to happen that 90% of people (or even 9%) would die of the vaccine - that if there were massive deaths, the ruling class would end up before a firing squad.
You, on the other hand, insisted that people would drop dead like flies, but that they would obediently go get the next booster.
And then when called out, you blamed the discrepancy between the 90% you predicted would die and the rounding error from 0% that did die on... 15% not getting the vaccine.
If they win in a coalition with tradcons, they'll have to behave themselves or be kicked to the curb.