"Unarmed" meaning 'wasn't holding the gun at the precise moment he was shot'.
A person wearing a ski mask exits the passenger door and runs toward a parking lot.
So, a guy with a gun, who fired that gun at police, was driving around wearing a ski mask in late June.
He got precisely what he deserved.
One of the attorneys, Bobby DiCello, called the burst of police gunfire excessive and unreasonable
Once you've decided to pull the trigger, you've decided you're ok with killing whoever the gun is pointed at. As soon as you've fired one shot, there's no reason not to empty the entire magazine into the target.
'Excessive' is a nonsensical concept as soon as you start thinking strategically.
One bullet is all it takes to kill, so if you're willing to shoot once, why WOULD you only shoot once? They might shoot back!
You shoot until you're certain they CAN'T shoot back.
Watch any combat footage. People generally only get shot once or twice when they're killed from long range with precision shots. For anything else, people get shot until they drop, and once they're dropped, they typically get shot five more times because you do NOT want to approach a fatally wounded man with a gun while he can still potentially pull the trigger.
Of course they refuse to mention the fact he was armed let alone firing at police while driving until deep in. The standards they want to hold others in indescribable.
A handgun, a loaded magazine and an apparent wedding ring were found on the seat of the car. A casing consistent with the weapon was later found in the area where officers believed a shot had come from the vehicle.
can you link the uncensored video? I'm only able to find cucked media reports that refuse to show the footage "out of respect for walker and his family". I don't want to have to dig around for an hour to find the uncensored footage.
"Walker’s family’s attorney, Bobby DiCello, said officers shot 90 times, hitting Walker 60 times in the face, abdomen, buttocks, back, both arms and both legs."
What a bunch of healthy individuals. Wonder if they bukkake'd the body when done.
The thing is, even a fatal shot isn't necessarily immediately fatal. They key point about being under fire isn't that you want the other guy dead, it's that you want them to stop shooting at you. So, yes, because people can sometimes keep going for a few minutes before actually keeling over, and given the accuracy under stress of a lot of police officers, police will tend to expend a hell of a lot of ammunition under these circumstances.
Sixty hits from ninety rounds is, all things considered, extremely good accuracy.
When the Met police executed Jean Charles de Menezes - a guy they had hands on at the time - they still missed four shots from the eleven fired.
If you can't tell if you're shooting something dead or alive you may be a retard.
That's not at all the point I was making.
The police may well have been shooting at the guy because he wasn't quite dead yet - the dude still had a pulse when they went to him afterwards.
You'd be a foolish police officer indeed to fire a shot at a guy, wander up to arrest him, and get yourself shot in the face because he's not actually dead yet, wouldn't you?
You're projecting. I understand the argument. I just can tell things are dead when they look like a sieve. What if the dude had a buddy. Do they need 180 bullets for two people?
It's fucking insane. Just give them uzis already
"Unarmed" meaning 'wasn't holding the gun at the precise moment he was shot'.
So, a guy with a gun, who fired that gun at police, was driving around wearing a ski mask in late June.
He got precisely what he deserved.
Once you've decided to pull the trigger, you've decided you're ok with killing whoever the gun is pointed at. As soon as you've fired one shot, there's no reason not to empty the entire magazine into the target.
Bonnie and Clyde the motherfucker.
'Excessive' is a nonsensical concept as soon as you start thinking strategically.
One bullet is all it takes to kill, so if you're willing to shoot once, why WOULD you only shoot once? They might shoot back!
You shoot until you're certain they CAN'T shoot back.
Watch any combat footage. People generally only get shot once or twice when they're killed from long range with precision shots. For anything else, people get shot until they drop, and once they're dropped, they typically get shot five more times because you do NOT want to approach a fatally wounded man with a gun while he can still potentially pull the trigger.
Of course they refuse to mention the fact he was armed let alone firing at police while driving until deep in. The standards they want to hold others in indescribable.
The video is pretty funny. They just keep shooting.
can you link the uncensored video? I'm only able to find cucked media reports that refuse to show the footage "out of respect for walker and his family". I don't want to have to dig around for an hour to find the uncensored footage.
Here you go.
It seems pretty psychotic to me.
"Walker’s family’s attorney, Bobby DiCello, said officers shot 90 times, hitting Walker 60 times in the face, abdomen, buttocks, back, both arms and both legs."
What a bunch of healthy individuals. Wonder if they bukkake'd the body when done.
The thing is, even a fatal shot isn't necessarily immediately fatal. They key point about being under fire isn't that you want the other guy dead, it's that you want them to stop shooting at you. So, yes, because people can sometimes keep going for a few minutes before actually keeling over, and given the accuracy under stress of a lot of police officers, police will tend to expend a hell of a lot of ammunition under these circumstances.
Sixty hits from ninety rounds is, all things considered, extremely good accuracy.
When the Met police executed Jean Charles de Menezes - a guy they had hands on at the time - they still missed four shots from the eleven fired.
I just never got into gore porn online. Playing with dead meat is morbid.
If you can't tell if you're shooting something dead or alive you may be a retard. They seem pretty retarded to me.
It's also pretty sad how desensitized people generally are. Getting downvoted by ghouls: die angry(;
I recognize you as a total faggot
No, u
That's not at all the point I was making.
The police may well have been shooting at the guy because he wasn't quite dead yet - the dude still had a pulse when they went to him afterwards.
You'd be a foolish police officer indeed to fire a shot at a guy, wander up to arrest him, and get yourself shot in the face because he's not actually dead yet, wouldn't you?
It sounds really retarded to try and arrest someone you think is dead
Almost as retarded as deliberately misinterpreting an argument so you can call people retards, in fact...
You're projecting. I understand the argument. I just can tell things are dead when they look like a sieve. What if the dude had a buddy. Do they need 180 bullets for two people? It's fucking insane. Just give them uzis already
...You realize that he was alive, right? So... You're the one who can't tell something dead from alive, here... Which according to your logic...
I'm pretty sure I can tell a dead body when it has about 4-5 holes in the head
Is it still racist if the black suspect you chase and shoot can't be identified while wearing a ski mask?