Remember that they're perfectly okay with the death of a man's dreams, future, ect when it means a free meal ticket for them via baby trapping. I feel like I'm beating a dead horse at this point but I can't emphasize this enough: They could have had enthusiastic male allies in their fight to preserve abortion had they actually cared about their reproductive rights more than their right to enslave men. Now they're experiencing that thing leftists are so eager to advocate for when they're not the ones being fucked over: Consequences. They'll never learn if they're constantly shielded from the consequences of their shitty behavior.
Simple as "economic" abortion. Dad can just nope the fuck out legally/financially/custodially from the get-go. It's not pretty, but it's more fair than the current situation.
Might make sense if child poverty rates were exceptionally low and birth rates were astronomically high, but when you're below replacement it seems absolutely batshit to further discourage people from having kids.
It discourages births to single mothers, which we incentivize right now by forcing the father to provide a no strings attached subsidy. Kids raised by single mothers have awful outcomes, especially boys. We don't need yet another generation of pussies and criminals because mommy wanted to give birth to a living paycheck.
Besides, the current system already discourages people from having kids. It's hard to justify putting a woman in a position to rob you blind and keep you away from your kids if things don't work out. It's impossible to have a healthy relationship with that Sword of Damocles hanging over your head. Of course we could repeal all the "advances" feminism made and purge the family courts. That would solve the vast majority of our problems and render this discussion largely moot.
Remember that they're perfectly okay with the death of a man's dreams, future, ect when it means a free meal ticket for them via baby trapping. I feel like I'm beating a dead horse at this point but I can't emphasize this enough: They could have had enthusiastic male allies in their fight to preserve abortion had they actually cared about their reproductive rights more than their right to enslave men. Now they're experiencing that thing leftists are so eager to advocate for when they're not the ones being fucked over: Consequences. They'll never learn if they're constantly shielded from the consequences of their shitty behavior.
Now I am curious. How exactly would you stop 'baby trapping'?
Simple as "economic" abortion. Dad can just nope the fuck out legally/financially/custodially from the get-go. It's not pretty, but it's more fair than the current situation.
Might make sense if child poverty rates were exceptionally low and birth rates were astronomically high, but when you're below replacement it seems absolutely batshit to further discourage people from having kids.
It discourages births to single mothers, which we incentivize right now by forcing the father to provide a no strings attached subsidy. Kids raised by single mothers have awful outcomes, especially boys. We don't need yet another generation of pussies and criminals because mommy wanted to give birth to a living paycheck.
Besides, the current system already discourages people from having kids. It's hard to justify putting a woman in a position to rob you blind and keep you away from your kids if things don't work out. It's impossible to have a healthy relationship with that Sword of Damocles hanging over your head. Of course we could repeal all the "advances" feminism made and purge the family courts. That would solve the vast majority of our problems and render this discussion largely moot.
You don't want people having kids who don't want kids. They come out maladjusted.