All programs that remove output because it is not compliant with what the programmer personally wanted, are always useless.
Either the function executes correctly, or it doesn't.
If you are trying to cultivate your results to fit your premise, but the procedure is logically valid, then it is your premise that is wrong.
This is the very essence of why the answer to the question: "What is the meaning of life, the universe, and everything?" is "42". You are ordering the computer to give you an answer that will always be invalid. 42 is as correct as 43 for that question.
An useless AI basically. Don't worry, the Chinese are training theirs AI with real data.
Until they see something they don't like.
An Uyghur?
They have an AI to spot them outside the reservation (Dahua automated surveillance camera system).
AI is just a thousand students working unpaid overtime.
I think they can get by without having Winnie the Pooh in the lexicon.
Winnie the Poo?
When they see it, they acknowledge it and hide it at most. The Chinese are playing the long game here.
All programs that remove output because it is not compliant with what the programmer personally wanted, are always useless.
Either the function executes correctly, or it doesn't.
If you are trying to cultivate your results to fit your premise, but the procedure is logically valid, then it is your premise that is wrong.
This is the very essence of why the answer to the question: "What is the meaning of life, the universe, and everything?" is "42". You are ordering the computer to give you an answer that will always be invalid. 42 is as correct as 43 for that question.