Ukraine has no death penalty for anything, and even Russia has a moratorium (and doesn't use Stalin's WWII law), and so Girkin commited murders. He's a self admitted serial murderer even according to Russian laws.
Does Russian law apply in Slaviyansk?
But again, they tolerate him.
I suspect that if they didn't, they would be criticized for 'attacking a dissident'.
So what was about the "total evacuation" again?
Doesn't matter. Why is Ukraine shelling civilian areas? More importantly, why are we sending weapons so they can murder people they claim as their own citizens, and why aren't our corrupt governments criticizing this? We know the answer...
Hes a Russian citizen living in Russia, Russian laws apply to him there. But of course they don't care about it, or about him. He's a grumpy loser who doesn't even literally LARP as a Roman officer anymore. His writings can be insightful but he's a doomposter.
I don't know who's doing the alleged shelling. I'll presume the usual Russian provocations unless they ever allow the international investigations of anything.
He's a grumpy loser who doesn't even literally LARP as a Roman officer anymore.
I'll take this as you saying that Russia was wise in forcing him to be fired?
I don't know who's doing the alleged shelling. I'll presume the usual Russian provocations
OK, so it's Russia shelling Donetsk? And they somehow don't figure out that the shelling is coming from Russian positions.
Ukraine literally can do nothing wrong. Quite impressive. Nothing you say will alter my positive opinion of you, but I think you realize that you're not exactly being fair or objective here.
unless they ever allow the international investigations of anything.
Was there an international investigation of Mariupol?
He was a gifted commander and he knew when to quit. That makes him the top dog among the entire cast of the Russian Spring, most of them are dead.
I still wonder was his bait column aware he sent them to their deaths. It was tactically genial but damn it was fucking ruthless. Literally no survivors to tell their story.
Does Russian law apply in Slaviyansk?
I suspect that if they didn't, they would be criticized for 'attacking a dissident'.
Doesn't matter. Why is Ukraine shelling civilian areas? More importantly, why are we sending weapons so they can murder people they claim as their own citizens, and why aren't our corrupt governments criticizing this? We know the answer...
Hes a Russian citizen living in Russia, Russian laws apply to him there. But of course they don't care about it, or about him. He's a grumpy loser who doesn't even literally LARP as a Roman officer anymore. His writings can be insightful but he's a doomposter.
I don't know who's doing the alleged shelling. I'll presume the usual Russian provocations unless they ever allow the international investigations of anything.
I'll take this as you saying that Russia was wise in forcing him to be fired?
OK, so it's Russia shelling Donetsk? And they somehow don't figure out that the shelling is coming from Russian positions.
Ukraine literally can do nothing wrong. Quite impressive. Nothing you say will alter my positive opinion of you, but I think you realize that you're not exactly being fair or objective here.
Was there an international investigation of Mariupol?
He was a gifted commander and he knew when to quit. That makes him the top dog among the entire cast of the Russian Spring, most of them are dead.
I still wonder was his bait column aware he sent them to their deaths. It was tactically genial but damn it was fucking ruthless. Literally no survivors to tell their story.
There was one for MH17, there are more now.
Is there anyone who isn't 'ruthless'?
There's just ruthless and effective, and ruthless and ineffective.