Another example of how fake the idea of universal law is, without a unified national culture. There are many laws like this where the definitions of terms are entirely subjective and up to a judge to determine what a "reasonable person" believes. Another example is New York's law on gender identities and pronouns, which applies to government offices and I believe schools. It doesn't define what a gender identity is, but lets courts make a determination based on what all us reasonable people naturally understand. So you can demand the city identify you as Ze/Zie/Faerself/Spivak/Otherkin because obviously those are the "real" made up identities, but you wouldn't be allowed to identify as "Apache Helicopter" because a judge would say nobody believes that's a real gender. There's nothing written in the law saying that, it's just known.

Such nonsense is more pronounced when there is no longer a standard of what's reasonable either because your society is full of non-assimilating immigrants (Muslim refugees) or is in the midst of a cultural revolution. (wokism) It's not a huge problem with homogenous nations but in divided and pluralistic nations justice no longer exists. There is only authority.