Just criticize pedophiles and watch them circle the wagons.
You mispelled "teenage sex hysteria by old elderly people. My grandma also thought the reason teens had sex with each other was because someone must have tricked them into it.
The problem in that is that people, usually prude Americans, include normal attractions like hebephilia and ephebophilia in that. Which by definition is not pedophilia.
Thank you for making my case for me. Your description of Hebephilia shows that it is indeed different from pedophilia. Mind posting that definition as well?
You seem to have a comprehension problem, as well as a reading problem. Words and terms mean stuff, to point this out doesn't mean you have to support it. You're reading your own bias into it, and are projecting your offended ego through an emotional Ad hominem attack. Be better than SJW's.
Ah, yes, "normal attractions." What's "normal" these days, when anyone with the most bizarre and formerly obscure fetish finds like-minded perverts with the miracle of the internet? How about coprophilia? How about the difference between fantasizing about sex with kids under 18 and stalking, seducing, and fucking them?
Usually, normal means the average and/or what the majority include. In this case that would still be our natural evolutionary instinct. So, straight cis men+women, and sperm-producing males and egg-producing females.
I'm not afraid to speak my mind, and point out facts. Even in the face of mob rule and peer pressure. Offense is taken, not given. Something they'd otherwise agree with, when it suits them.
It's actually pretty easy to tell who is a pedophile. Just criticize pedophiles and watch them circle the wagons.
You mispelled "teenage sex hysteria by old elderly people. My grandma also thought the reason teens had sex with each other was because someone must have tricked them into it.
The problem in that is that people, usually prude Americans, include normal attractions like hebephilia and ephebophilia in that. Which by definition is not pedophilia.
^ Exhibit A.
He only said "pedophile" but you pop out of the woodwork to parse words and defend your attraction.
[Tl Note: hEbEpHiLiA "is the strong, persistent sexual interest by adults in pubescent children who are in early adolescence, typically ages 11–14"]
Posting because I found it amusing that dude's distinction's aren't really helping him.
Thank you for making my case for me. Your description of Hebephilia shows that it is indeed different from pedophilia. Mind posting that definition as well?
You seem to have a comprehension problem, as well as a reading problem. Words and terms mean stuff, to point this out doesn't mean you have to support it. You're reading your own bias into it, and are projecting your offended ego through an emotional Ad hominem attack. Be better than SJW's.
Me
Ah, yes, "normal attractions." What's "normal" these days, when anyone with the most bizarre and formerly obscure fetish finds like-minded perverts with the miracle of the internet? How about coprophilia? How about the difference between fantasizing about sex with kids under 18 and stalking, seducing, and fucking them?
Usually, normal means the average and/or what the majority include. In this case that would still be our natural evolutionary instinct. So, straight cis men+women, and sperm-producing males and egg-producing females.
I'm not afraid to speak my mind, and point out facts. Even in the face of mob rule and peer pressure. Offense is taken, not given. Something they'd otherwise agree with, when it suits them.