I'm just nice and it feels a little mean, even if it's fully earned, so that was my initial reaction. I don't have an actually compelling reason against it because I do think gatekeeping is pretty necessary.
Idk, I'm kind of torn on it tbh. I don't think they're here for honest discussion, and gatekeeping isn't a terrible idea for people like that.. and they are gatekeeped quite a bit, just those two are unique in that they just come right back saying the same stupid shit over and over.
I think that the focusing on individual users is very Taylor Lorenze -esque. I dont see how it will do anything but destroy the wins in time, when everyone breaks into infighting.
I also dont recognize this OP, either. Which is even a bit more suspect. Something similar happened in another sub I follow- trying to stir up drama between other accounts.
I am also heavily against censorship, even with fagposts.
You have the aptly named CP place for that retarded nonsense. That place is like browsing some reddit communist blaming whites for everything. Go there.
Spending all our time on race will eventually make us negasjw. It is much better to build up our own communities then turning into eventual bizarro pinkohairs.
I could do without the singling out but it's worth bringing up when we have a janny protecting sacred groups Faggit style. The tranny fucker at the other place can't shut us down here so there's no reason to protect his pet troons from hurt fee fees. It's pathetic regardless of which group is being protected from criticism.
Except neither the JQ people or the woman haters you keep censoring advocate for mass murder. Even I made exceptions for the troons who haven't gone on to groom others, because I think they deserve help and a chance to live happily with what their creator gave them. The ones who do groom others? I don't know what you want me to say. I'm not going to sit here and pretend that the ones who don't groom others make it okay not to deal with the ones who do.
I agree- where someone can be a hateful faggot, and not be worth destroying a sub over.
There have been other subs I like - where handshakes try this same effort - they pick out some random poster, then take some post out of context (or fabricate the post) and try to turn the rest of the sub against itself. And this is exactly what they did in gamerghazi, it reeks of SJW infiltration, IMO. Even without the gentlemens agreement of not going CNN on other anons.
THis is some gay shit. if you dont like a faggot keep it in pms. This place aint gamergayzi.
Yeah I don't like posts that single people out like this.
I'm not one of his sympathizers by any means but it feels like a violation of decorum.
Yeeeah.. more I think about it the less I care.
I'm just nice and it feels a little mean, even if it's fully earned, so that was my initial reaction. I don't have an actually compelling reason against it because I do think gatekeeping is pretty necessary.
I dont want to defend our resident cringe lord, and he is a tremendous FAGGOT.
there is no evidence in the OP that the named fag is the source of the report.
The presumption that he did could be the product of bad intent.
ANd further, it does nothing but DIVIDE this sub. Of course, some people would like to divide the wins. 👻 🎃 👍
Posts directed to RDJ and Imp1 give this place a tiresome, cliquey vibe that undermines our discussion. It's juvenile.
Idk, I'm kind of torn on it tbh. I don't think they're here for honest discussion, and gatekeeping isn't a terrible idea for people like that.. and they are gatekeeped quite a bit, just those two are unique in that they just come right back saying the same stupid shit over and over.
I just feel like this is the wrong way to do it.
I think that the focusing on individual users is very Taylor Lorenze -esque. I dont see how it will do anything but destroy the wins in time, when everyone breaks into infighting.
I also dont recognize this OP, either. Which is even a bit more suspect. Something similar happened in another sub I follow- trying to stir up drama between other accounts.
I am also heavily against censorship, even with fagposts.
Getting banned for calling out Jewish bullshit derails our countries. It's juvenile.
You have the aptly named CP place for that retarded nonsense. That place is like browsing some reddit communist blaming whites for everything. Go there.
Spending all our time on race will eventually make us negasjw. It is much better to build up our own communities then turning into eventual bizarro pinkohairs.
I could do without the singling out but it's worth bringing up when we have a janny protecting sacred groups Faggit style. The tranny fucker at the other place can't shut us down here so there's no reason to protect his pet troons from hurt fee fees. It's pathetic regardless of which group is being protected from criticism.
No one's being protected from "criticism".
You can't just advocate for mass murder. I think the standard is fair.
Except neither the JQ people or the woman haters you keep censoring advocate for mass murder. Even I made exceptions for the troons who haven't gone on to groom others, because I think they deserve help and a chance to live happily with what their creator gave them. The ones who do groom others? I don't know what you want me to say. I'm not going to sit here and pretend that the ones who don't groom others make it okay not to deal with the ones who do.
I agree- where someone can be a hateful faggot, and not be worth destroying a sub over.
There have been other subs I like - where handshakes try this same effort - they pick out some random poster, then take some post out of context (or fabricate the post) and try to turn the rest of the sub against itself. And this is exactly what they did in gamerghazi, it reeks of SJW infiltration, IMO. Even without the gentlemens agreement of not going CNN on other anons.
Lol no.