How modern-day “peer review” and “scientific consensus” works
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
From my point of view dealing with this same garbage.
You have the expert, and then the people that need the use the tool. They offer input, but not the final sign off because they're usually idiots outside their narrow areas of expertise (and even there, they still might be dumb).
I've run into the same sort of issue before.
All the business buzzwords/etc are used to pawn off responsibility and accountability for anything.