I still find it hilarious that the idea of "ratio" has become so ingrained in thier twitter obsessed minds that they think it is a major win of some form.
Especially considering they literally changed the meaning of it to suit them and their even lazier form of activism.
A far too large number of our side is no different than the opposite, just a different flavor. They fall for the same grifts, the same pitfalls, and the same tricks with a face saying words they like instead.
Maybe your side includes retards and stupids, but those people are excluded from my side.
And when you say 'our side', are you including the faggots and homosexuals on dot win that openly proclaim their degeneracy? This is quickly turning into a site full of scum and leftist degenerates.
And then there’s me, not even sure what ratioing means.
I’ve gathered it’s some kind of consensus thing. Which yeah, tells you how these people see things, they’re more concerned about fitting in with the cutting edge progressives, as opposed to what they can reckon themselves to be true.
It used to mean you had more "retweets" than likes, the implication being that you said something so stupid/controversial you had more people calling you out than agreeing with you. Pretty dumb, but a decent metric of how well a certain statement was doing with the followers.
Trannies changed it a bit ago to just mean "my tweet got more likes than the person I am quoting, which means I am superior!"
Anyone with half a brain would just mute the conversation.
When I used Twitter, I would say my peace and mute conversation, knowing that people were gonna lose their shit in the replies. It actually felt good knowing that I ruined someone's day with a harmless comment and their replies would never even reach me lol.
The original definition did have some meaning, especially on review sites. Some flaming pile of woke shit would get top scores from "critics" but the audience score would tell the truth. In the Twatter context it referred a tweet getting more replies than likes which was a sign people were pointing out how retarded the tweet is. Color me unsurprised that the troons just make shit up as they go along.
I still find it hilarious that the idea of "ratio" has become so ingrained in thier twitter obsessed minds that they think it is a major win of some form.
Especially considering they literally changed the meaning of it to suit them and their even lazier form of activism.
Not gonna lie, there are far too many people on our side of the culture war who believe the same.
A far too large number of our side is no different than the opposite, just a different flavor. They fall for the same grifts, the same pitfalls, and the same tricks with a face saying words they like instead.
It's the lower 80%. The time to wipe the slate clean is long past.
Most people on "both sides" are some form of liberal that is immersed in hyperreality.
Maybe your side includes retards and stupids, but those people are excluded from my side.
And when you say 'our side', are you including the faggots and homosexuals on dot win that openly proclaim their degeneracy? This is quickly turning into a site full of scum and leftist degenerates.
And then there’s me, not even sure what ratioing means.
I’ve gathered it’s some kind of consensus thing. Which yeah, tells you how these people see things, they’re more concerned about fitting in with the cutting edge progressives, as opposed to what they can reckon themselves to be true.
Fuck Twitter is fucking retarded as hell…
It used to mean you had more "retweets" than likes, the implication being that you said something so stupid/controversial you had more people calling you out than agreeing with you. Pretty dumb, but a decent metric of how well a certain statement was doing with the followers.
Trannies changed it a bit ago to just mean "my tweet got more likes than the person I am quoting, which means I am superior!"
Anyone with half a brain would just mute the conversation.
When I used Twitter, I would say my peace and mute conversation, knowing that people were gonna lose their shit in the replies. It actually felt good knowing that I ruined someone's day with a harmless comment and their replies would never even reach me lol.
The original definition did have some meaning, especially on review sites. Some flaming pile of woke shit would get top scores from "critics" but the audience score would tell the truth. In the Twatter context it referred a tweet getting more replies than likes which was a sign people were pointing out how retarded the tweet is. Color me unsurprised that the troons just make shit up as they go along.