Jim Sterling, 2022
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (120)
sorted by:
Ummm, no one was associating groomers with the gays until the Alphabet Queers themselves started calling it the "don't say gay" bill.
Everyday I'm moving towards the idea that these people (racial-, sexual-, and faggotry-activists) are pushing for a race war by making their respective groups seem so insufferable that self-respecting normies start to feel they have no choice but to take action against them.
Gays were always associated with pedophilia. In the 70s and 80s the "Gay rights" groups all included NAMBLA and similar other groups. The people who are considered gay "civil rights" icons were all pedos, Harvey Milk, Richard Hays, John Money, etc.
Gays are less than 1% of the population but commit sexual abuse of children at a rate that's 30-40x higher than normal people. The stereotype is just a rational response to observable pattern of behavior
So 1/40?
13/50 (or whatever it is at) is based on percentages.
So, it would have to be 1/4000
13/50 is read as 13% (black population) do 50% (of the crime).
1/40 would then read as 1% (gay male population) do 40% (of the pederasty)
Don't think those numbers are right though, and this is the best source of numbers I could find. It puts (homo/bi)sexuals at ~16x the abuse rate (100x for teachers) and about a third of the acts. So that would be 2/33; two percent does thirty-three percent
1/4000 doesn't fit the pattern; one percent does four thousand percent?
No, 1/40 is correct. 1% does 40%. Like 13/50 is 13% does 50%.