I was watching this movie, and turned it the fuck off as soon as the gay shit happened. I was about to turn it off before it went into the realms of faggotry, because it was just so God damn boring.
Well, read the Sam Elliott bits, the rest was Cumbe**ramble*batch and can mostly be ignored as regurgitated leftist nonsense- you've heard it all before already.
I like how these people posture themselves as the arbiters of self-actualization while also having this "hook 'em while they're young" approach and advocating for so much "education."
Shame to.hear this movie is.more.globohomo pomo rewriting the past garbage. Should have guessed with all the award nominations. Campion is a great director but we don't need her gay take on the Wild West.
That said, while Elliot seems like his head's in the right place, 1883 had its own diversity and yas kween slay moments that are very ahistorical.
“I really do believe that. Again, without sounding too pretentious, I just think that is one of the things that art categorically is socially, societally incredibly important for at every level, at every level.”
You sound incredibly pretentious.
Acting is not important, at any level. Children are capable of doing it. It's not special or unique.
Do you have some special training that qualifies you to make this proclamation? Or, is this the kind of thing you have to say out loud and often in order to remain relevant in your tribe?
Sherlock was modern woke garbage. How many things do you have to ruin before you'll be satisfied?
Wow, cumberbatch is deeeeep in the cult.
Well he is kind of below average looking himself.
You have no idea.
I was watching this movie, and turned it the fuck off as soon as the gay shit happened. I was about to turn it off before it went into the realms of faggotry, because it was just so God damn boring.
This is who Elliot really is. Cumberbatch doesn't accept Elliot for who he is. Cumberbatch doesn't accept people for who they really are.
Sam Elliotts's criticism is really good so read the entire article.
Well, read the Sam Elliott bits, the rest was Cumbe**ramble*batch and can mostly be ignored as regurgitated leftist nonsense- you've heard it all before already.
I like how these people posture themselves as the arbiters of self-actualization while also having this "hook 'em while they're young" approach and advocating for so much "education."
All this talk of "toxic masculinity" and I thought the character's issue in the movie was repressed faggotry.
I haven't seen the movie, but it sounds like the character's problem is not repressing his faggotry.
Shame to.hear this movie is.more.globohomo pomo rewriting the past garbage. Should have guessed with all the award nominations. Campion is a great director but we don't need her gay take on the Wild West.
That said, while Elliot seems like his head's in the right place, 1883 had its own diversity and yas kween slay moments that are very ahistorical.
“I really do believe that. Again, without sounding too pretentious, I just think that is one of the things that art categorically is socially, societally incredibly important for at every level, at every level.”
You sound incredibly pretentious.
Acting is not important, at any level. Children are capable of doing it. It's not special or unique.
Do you have some special training that qualifies you to make this proclamation? Or, is this the kind of thing you have to say out loud and often in order to remain relevant in your tribe?
Sherlock was modern woke garbage. How many things do you have to ruin before you'll be satisfied?
“I really do believe that. Again, without sounding too pretentious..”
Imma stop you right there.
Who's surprised?