She should have been acquitted, since she had every right to shoot that career criminal.
Prepare for crime to get even more out of control. If you have to shoot anyone who is black, the criminal terror regime come after you like Stalin went after Kamanev.
She didn't even have the right to pull a gun and she knew it. The whole pathetic misdirection act should have been seen right through. It's not possible to just forget where things have been for decades and "take the wrong one".
Because the low sentence was not because she was a woman. It was commensurate with a previous sentence handed down from a few years back. Add to the fact that she shouldn’t have served any time to begin with for icing a degenerate career criminal, and is only serving jail time because the dude was black.
Tasers don't even feel like handguns. I don't care if you've got some adrenaline in your system, if you're incapable of recognizing which weapon you're drawing, you don't belong on the force.
So, the saga concludes. From 10 years being what the prosecutors wanted, down to 7, down to 2, with the last 8 months of it suspended.
1-6 is my record of predictions on this and all I can say is, I'm surprised they let it get this far, but now BLM has fallen apart, they don't need to pretend to care she killed a man.
Overall, I think my predictions were slightly pessimistic and I should have just predicted this outcome from the beginning.
It's one thing to make bad predictions. We all do sometimes. It's quite another to make them with absolute certainty, when your predictions are so wildly implausible. It shows a lack of understanding of what is likely to happen.
But not even that. It's that when you were wrong about your first two, you didn't miss a beat and moved on to your next predictions, made with an equal amount of certainty, which turned out to be equally wrong.
There was no way she would face an actual sentence proportionate to her crime
Which is an acquittal.
and I just continued getting surprised by how far they took the farce.
Except that close to this exact same thing happened about 10 years ago, and the police officer there got... 1.5 years. You're not whining about that one, because the cop wasn't a woman, so you don't assume that it was a part of The Genocide.
The last one, 1 year with probation. 12 months, 16 isn't that much of a difference.
Not really. I think if BLM wasn't around, she wouldn't have even been named. I'm surprised how far they went to appease the race war cult, even though women control it and could have just hidden it.
The last one, 1 year with probation. 12 months, 16 isn't that much of a difference.
What? You've spent the last year claiming that she wouldn't spend a single day in prison, then after you discovered that she was jailed before sentencing it became that she would "just get probation during sentencing". And when she doesn't, you claim that 1.5 years in prison is just the same as probation?
I'm surprised how far they went to appease the race war cult, even though women control it and could have just hidden it.
Very sophisticated understanding of what's going on.
When I saw the prosecution drop the sentencing guideline, I knew it was going to be the literal minimum sentence or close to it. I predicted 1 year prison + 9 probation, but they went for 16 months prison + 8 months probation.
I mean, if you haven't worked out yet that these race movements cover for female privilege and provoke division in men, you never will.
When I saw the prosecution drop the sentencing guideline, I knew it was going to be the literal minimum sentence or close to it.
Did you even read your own article? The prosecution followed the guideline instead of as it previously did, demand a harsher penalty. And yes, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that the prosecution is in trouble when it does that.
I predicted 1 year prison + 9 probation
Did you make it publicly, or is this an after the fact prediction?
Because I recall you saying that she would not be sentenced to prison at all.
I mean, if you haven't worked out yet that these race movements cover for female privilege and provoke division in men, you never will.
I mean, I'm not the one who's getting everything wrong, from the male curfew to women being exempted from AstraZeneca, to Von der Leyen using the ECB to force all European countries to impose a vaccine mandate.
But it's not even about being wrong. It's about the child-like understanding of politics that you have. Hard to believe that you're an adult, although you otherwise do behave like one.
She should have been acquitted, since she had every right to shoot that career criminal.
Prepare for crime to get even more out of control. If you have to shoot anyone who is black, the criminal terror regime come after you like Stalin went after Kamanev.
She didn't even have the right to pull a gun and she knew it. The whole pathetic misdirection act should have been seen right through. It's not possible to just forget where things have been for decades and "take the wrong one".
Ah right, we should all have 'seen' that she just wanted to kill a man because she hates men.
Makes more sense than "police officers are hunting black men for sport" or whatever retarded narrative woman-led BLM was going for.
You have less of an excuse. People who believe that, are manipulated by propaganda. You spin your own tales and then choke on your own propaganda.
Imp, you need to seriously tone down your woman hate-boner for a second.
Why.
Because the low sentence was not because she was a woman. It was commensurate with a previous sentence handed down from a few years back. Add to the fact that she shouldn’t have served any time to begin with for icing a degenerate career criminal, and is only serving jail time because the dude was black.
Search your heart, you know it’s true.
Yeah, we're in post-BLM era now. Women's race war cult pushed the sentences up, but conveniently, one of their own doesn't feel it.
Yes it is lmao. Happens to cops fairly often.
Tasers don't even feel like handguns. I don't care if you've got some adrenaline in your system, if you're incapable of recognizing which weapon you're drawing, you don't belong on the force.
Stunning and brave. Don't care.
Should be 0 since she iced a degenerate criminal.
Of course, pork pass and pussy pass.
u/AntonioOfVenice
So, the saga concludes. From 10 years being what the prosecutors wanted, down to 7, down to 2, with the last 8 months of it suspended.
1-6 is my record of predictions on this and all I can say is, I'm surprised they let it get this far, but now BLM has fallen apart, they don't need to pretend to care she killed a man.
Overall, I think my predictions were slightly pessimistic and I should have just predicted this outcome from the beginning.
She made the mistake but the guy running when cops are telling you to stop made the bigger mistake. I thought she would get more time
I thought she wouldn't even get named. The fact that it got this far amazes me.
I took a lot of hits to my credibility on this one, but I still think it was solely political positioning that was why it got this far.
Women have killed people in cold blood and got less than this.
It's one thing to make bad predictions. We all do sometimes. It's quite another to make them with absolute certainty, when your predictions are so wildly implausible. It shows a lack of understanding of what is likely to happen.
But not even that. It's that when you were wrong about your first two, you didn't miss a beat and moved on to your next predictions, made with an equal amount of certainty, which turned out to be equally wrong.
In hindsight, I should have written out my entire thought process.
There was no way she would face an actual sentence proportionate to her crime and I just continued getting surprised by how far they took the farce.
In the end though, the prosecution turning against severe punishment yesterday was the obvious sign of it going this way.
Which is an acquittal.
Except that close to this exact same thing happened about 10 years ago, and the police officer there got... 1.5 years. You're not whining about that one, because the cop wasn't a woman, so you don't assume that it was a part of The Genocide.
No, it's 7-10 years. Chauvin got life.
It's a different time. Are you telling me that you think it's fair that she got next to nothing when Chauvin got a life sentence?
Come again? What is 7-10 years? I mean another case where the cop accidentally pulled his gun instead of his taser.
It's unfair that either of them have to spend any time in prison. But there is only one aspect that you fixate on.
1-6? 0-7. What was the prediction you got right? Your last one was that she would get probation.
I'm not even taking issue with the pessimism of your predictions, but that they are wildly implausible.
But at least you're learning.
The last one, 1 year with probation. 12 months, 16 isn't that much of a difference.
Not really. I think if BLM wasn't around, she wouldn't have even been named. I'm surprised how far they went to appease the race war cult, even though women control it and could have just hidden it.
What? You've spent the last year claiming that she wouldn't spend a single day in prison, then after you discovered that she was jailed before sentencing it became that she would "just get probation during sentencing". And when she doesn't, you claim that 1.5 years in prison is just the same as probation?
Very sophisticated understanding of what's going on.
When I saw the prosecution drop the sentencing guideline, I knew it was going to be the literal minimum sentence or close to it. I predicted 1 year prison + 9 probation, but they went for 16 months prison + 8 months probation.
I mean, if you haven't worked out yet that these race movements cover for female privilege and provoke division in men, you never will.
Did you even read your own article? The prosecution followed the guideline instead of as it previously did, demand a harsher penalty. And yes, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that the prosecution is in trouble when it does that.
Did you make it publicly, or is this an after the fact prediction?
Because I recall you saying that she would not be sentenced to prison at all.
I mean, I'm not the one who's getting everything wrong, from the male curfew to women being exempted from AstraZeneca, to Von der Leyen using the ECB to force all European countries to impose a vaccine mandate.
But it's not even about being wrong. It's about the child-like understanding of politics that you have. Hard to believe that you're an adult, although you otherwise do behave like one.