We're in one of the largest bubbles in market history, valuations are completely divorced from fundamentals.
It's happened before, and the market as a whole rebounded quickly. You cite one or two examples, which even if true, do not negate the fact that the market as a whole will be higher.
Because nobody knows.
You know. After all, they added an ingredient to cause myocarditis, which is what you claimed. So what is that ingredient?
What we know is that Pfizer and Moderna used different ingredients to Novavax, and the latter hasn't had a myocarditis scandal yet.
That's not what I asked. I asked what the ingredient was that they 'added'. Also, there is no 'scandal'. As far as I know, no one has yet died of vaccine-induced myocarditis.
I hope you're right. I really do. A financial collapse brings the possibility of failed painters and other tradcucked retards exploiting it. I'm not sure I could cope with living in ConPro's world.
But you just said that a financial collapse would lead to the end of the More Feminine terror regime.
I claimed it because it lines up with the differing risk profiles of the vaccines and the knowledge that they have different ingredients. Without internal knowledge, we can't know which ones exactly.
No, because you specifically claimed that they added something to achieve this. An addition with the intention to do harm, that's two elements, neither of which you disproved, and one of which you hilariously disproved at the time.
It's happened before, and the market as a whole rebounded quickly. You cite one or two examples, which even if true, do not negate the fact that the market as a whole will be higher.
You know. After all, they added an ingredient to cause myocarditis, which is what you claimed. So what is that ingredient?
That's not what I asked. I asked what the ingredient was that they 'added'. Also, there is no 'scandal'. As far as I know, no one has yet died of vaccine-induced myocarditis.
But you just said that a financial collapse would lead to the end of the More Feminine terror regime.
No, because you specifically claimed that they added something to achieve this. An addition with the intention to do harm, that's two elements, neither of which you disproved, and one of which you hilariously disproved at the time.
Nah, women support it, remember? And they're in the majority.
Actually, I disproved it when you first posted it, because the explanation that you posted in support of your claim disproved it.